Martmists added the comment:
> Specialized instructions are a hidden implementation detail, and instead the
> normal generic instruction will appear.
Will this change be reflected in co_code? If yes, then I'm aware of cases where
this may be used by bytecode modification lib
Martmists added the comment:
Another thing I found to be quite odd is JUMP_ABSOLUTE_QUICK, which is set as
40, but as it's derived from JUMP_ABSOLUTE it still requires an argument. This
makes HAVE_ARGUMENT useless as there's an op that doesn't follow the convention
New submission from Martmists :
Python 3.11.0a0 (heads/main:e6d1aa1, Oct 4 2021, 10:33:36) [GCC 11.1.0] on
linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import dis
>>> c = bytes([127, 1, 0, 2]) # L
Change by Martmists :
--
nosy: +martmists
nosy_count: 4.0 -> 5.0
pull_requests: +25048
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25465
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
