Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
The PR has already been merged.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39861>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I just opened a PR for that: https://github.com/python/python-docs-fr/pull/1176
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Agreed that we should attain to ISO 8601, as it solves two questions that
occurred in this thread:
- According to the specification, it is clear that a week must start on Monday
and end on Sunday. Hence datetime.strptime('201726', '%Y%U') could
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Also, may I move this issue to a GitHub PR?
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/iss
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
The patch is broken against Python 3.7. I'll try working on it.
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file47032/issue1100942_20170722.patch
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Therefore, should we implement the behavior of assuming the first day of the
week if none is provided or not?
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.p
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Applying review comments. Now, there is an internal link to the FAQ entry on
multidimensional lists.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file40337/issue23406_doc_stdtypes_and_faq.patch
___
Python tracker
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I'm attaching a patch to update the stdtypes.rst documentation according to our
discussion. I've replaced the table explanation to "equivalent to adding s to
itself n times" and added a link to the FAQ entry.
I'm not sure, however, wh
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Does anyone else think the note should be expanded? For me, it seems to be
pretty accurate although it may indeed be confusing to beginners.
If anything, I can work on rewriting it to be more explanatory.
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Just checking, it would be required to update Objects/unicodeobject.c,
Include/unicodeobject.h, and Doc/c-api/unicode.rst, right?
As far as I saw, "unicode" means a Python object with unicode string, "u" is a
UTF-8 encoded C
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I was referring to the table of operations.
So, what if I replace "n shallow copies of s concatenated" by "repeat s n times
and concatenate (to create a multidimensional list, refer
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Oh, I see... The pipes module uses os.system and os.popen to execute commands
under a /bin/sh environment. So you are proposing to re-implement it with
subprocess in order to execute commands without shell and, also, extend by
accepting argv-style
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Sure. I'll leave this issue for a while before others can emit their opinions.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3548
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Updated create_string_buffer docstring to create_string_buffer(aBytes,
anInteger) - character array.
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40279/issue24789_ctypes_doc_string.patch
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Let me check whether I understood you suggestion...
What you are saying is that it is already possible to pipeline shell commands
through subprocess, such as in the following line?
subprocess.call('ls -l | grep Music', shell=True)
However
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I just found this open issue and I can work on it. What is left to do before
closing it?
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3548
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I could get readline.insert_text() to work, ish, without calling startup_hook.
The script is attached to this message. Apparently, there is some need to call
readline.redisplay() to update what's on screen.
However, I can't really understand what's
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
As far as I noticed, in bdist_rpm.py, the _make_spec_file() method generates an
.spec file for RPM build and attaches the install script to setup.py install
-O1 --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT --record=INSTALLED_FILES.
Later, the .spec refers to the record
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
I tried to apply the last patch but it returned me and error of failing hunk. I
think it was based on an old version of the test_bdist_rpm.py file.
Hence, I made this updated version of the patch and could get the expected
failure during the tests.
I
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Is this issue still going on?
--
nosy: +matheus.v.portela
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue809163
Matheus Vieira Portela added the comment:
Apparently, the methods with leading underscore are being tested by two classes
(SourceLoaderBadBytecodeTest and SourcelessLoaderBadBytecodeTest) that
implement methods with similar names (but without the underscore).
Simply removing the underscore
21 matches
Mail list logo