Mohamed added the comment:
Thanks a lot
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44076>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mohamed added the comment:
These are the latest updates:
May 08, 2021, Microsoft Edge
May 06, 2021, Microsoft OneDrive
May 01, 2021, Update Health Tools
There is no an option to uninstall the following:
May 01, 2021-KB4023057: Update for Windows 10 Update Service components
Mohamed added the comment:
I chose Python to develop a huge information system.
I completed about 47%, and made a demonstration, so everything was working
correctly, as evidenced by presence of the data
Now, I can't go back, and I can't mo
Mohamed added the comment:
This statement in the main program which is calling a subprogram, to control
for multiple runs. Even I close this statement, the issue is same.
del sys.modules['cm_asset_add']
I've contacted Microsoft support team, they have different opin
Mohamed added the comment:
Please find attached, the demo with dummy data. As I mentioned, it was working
fine until May 1st.
Also, As I mentioned, in case I call MasterApp at the end of add function data
appears correctly. This means a malfunction occurred after Windows Update, and
it
Mohamed added the comment:
I made changes but result is same:
xrec = self.treedata.selection()[0]
xrec = int(xrec[1:], 16) - 1
print('xrec: ', xrec)
itemXid = assetinfo_lst[xrec]
itemXid = itemXid[1]
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most r
Mohamed added the comment:
I tried the following method:
class MasterApp(object):
def __init__(self, root):
def fun_astinfo_add(self):
...
assetinfo_lst.append(lst_values)
...
MasterApp(root)
...
if
Mohamed added the comment:
I'm using tkinter for a long time, my application was running fine till 1st
May, and suddenly happen this issue.
After adding a new data to a list, it showing in some places of tkinter
components. For example, in treeview, it shows based on running sp
Mohamed added the comment:
I'm using tkinter 8.6 with Python
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44076>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
New submission from Mohamed :
I am using Python under Windows 10 on Dell for a log time.
All of my applications on Python were working fine.
Suddenly from the beginning of May,
My apps do not update a "list" data after a new insert,
even with small data volume.
As well as choosin
Change by Mohamed Moselhy :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +24393
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25702
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Mohamed Moselhy :
See https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#function-annotations
The first section of https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html shows
quantity_on_hand: int=0, when there should be spacing around the '=' according
to PEP 8 (see
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
nosy: +koubaa
nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0
pull_requests: +22797
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21986
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +22417
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23535
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +22195
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23304
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +22092
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23188
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +22091
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23139
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +22007
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23091
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21507
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22490
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21506
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22489
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21372
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22328
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
New submission from mohamed koubaa :
The C-API documentation introduction contains an error:
"Almost all Python objects live on the
heap: you never declare an automatic or static variable of type
:c:type:`PyObject`, only pointer variables of type :c:type:`PyObject*` can be
declared. The
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21297
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22242
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21296
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22240
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21277
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/2
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21275
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/0
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
mohamed koubaa added the comment:
Something like this?
```
static PyObject *def;
PyMODINIT_FUNC
PyInit_mymod(void)
{
if (def == NULL) {
def = PyModuleDef_Init(&mymod);
}
return def;
}
```
Then add a flag to PyModuleDef to indicate it is already
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21239
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22165
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21238
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22164
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21227
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22145
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
mohamed koubaa added the comment:
What about a new PyModuleDef_Slot function?
```
static int my_can_create(/*need any arg??, InterpreterState, etc?*/) {
if (test_global_condition()) {
return -1; //Don't allow creation
}
return 0; //Allow creation
};
s
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21223
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22139
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
nosy: +koubaa
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +21219
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21986
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
nosy: +koubaa
nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0
pull_requests: +21220
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21986
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
nosy: +koubaa
nosy_count: 27.0 -> 28.0
pull_requests: +21218
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21986
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/iss
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21216
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22134
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21212
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22131
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
mohamed koubaa added the comment:
Sounds like there needs to be some python-wide global state that perhaps the
signal module wraps rather than owns. I could try to prototype it if you agree
--
nosy: +koubaa
___
Python tracker
<ht
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21148
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22051
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21147
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22050
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21146
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22049
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21109
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22003
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21101
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21995
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21095
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21986
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +21094
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21985
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20982
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21855
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20983
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21856
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20949
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21818
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20567
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21418
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20522
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21378
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20521
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21375
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
pull_requests: +20519
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21371
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1635
Change by mohamed koubaa :
--
nosy: +koubaa
nosy_count: 16.0 -> 17.0
pull_requests: +20471
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21319
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1
Shakeel Mohamed added the comment:
Hi, any plans to do this? If not, we can close it.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23542>
___
___
Python-bug
New submission from Shakeel Mohamed:
In the "Opting Out" section of PEP 476, there's a workaround for disabling SSL
cert verification.
I think it would be worth updating the section to include the following
workaround when using urllib2.build_opener(), like so:
unverif
55 matches
Mail list logo