Changes by Robert Siemer <robert.siemer-python@backsla.sh>:
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Changes by Robert Siemer <robert.siemer-python@backsla.sh>:
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
Changes by Robert Siemer robert.siemer-python@backsla.sh:
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10817
___
___
Python
Robert Siemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Update for my comment: python2.5.2 does not show that problem.
python2.4.5 did. I repeat, 2.5.2 does not clean up processes which are
still referenced, but it does clean unreferenced ones.
_
Tracker [EMAIL
Robert Siemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Bad design stays bad design: the hope that pids don't get reused soon
breaks two assumptions:
1) I don't have to wait() for a child process soon. It's the programs
business.
2) Pids cycle: there are security patches to make pids of future