Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: -SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue26791>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: -SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41380>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
SilentGhost added the comment:
Ehsonjon, please do not remove people from the nosy list.
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +SilentGhost, epaine, gregorlingl, terry.reedy, willingc
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.10
___
Python trac
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +ethan.furman
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41398>
___
___
Py
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +barry, maxking, r.david.murray
title: Wrong example, need scpae \" -> Escape needed in the email documentation
example
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
SilentGhost added the comment:
In your example you're instantiating ConfigParser with default parameters,
meaning empty_lines_in_values equals True, which leads to key "a" consuming
everything on the following indented lines. If you're were to specify Fal
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +lukasz.langa
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41363>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41321>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +davin, pitrou
type: crash -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41344>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mai
SilentGhost added the comment:
This was an intentional change, see #17400 and specifically commit
49e012e5492c1c70690ab72a8d03a980047148b5; so I'm going to close this issue as
not a bug.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: ope
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: -Extension Modules
nosy: +pitrou
versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41128>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +macOS
nosy: +ned.deily, ronaldoussoren
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41212>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
type: -> behavior
versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41157>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +barry, maxking, r.david.murray
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41157>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +ned.deily
type: -> security
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41189>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Change by SilentGhost :
Removed file:
https://bugs.python.org/file49263/Whatsapp-self-message-delivering-using-python-c55344b7f384e036bbe0fda69918c9eccf146dc1.zip
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
SilentGhost added the comment:
Your request is likely failing for entirely different reasons.
What you've done is encoded a str object into bytes object, which is
represented with as literal using b prefix. It isn't being sent over the socket.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
SilentGhost added the comment:
Ram, please fix the typo pointed out on github
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/59cf853332a82ce92875ea3dd6bba08e1305a288#r40044022
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Change by SilentGhost :
--
resolution: -> out of date
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25257>
___
___
SilentGhost added the comment:
This looks like an overflow failure in a bigmem test (though the given limit
24Gb should accommodate that?). Do bigmem tests work on Windows?
William, you've made some sort of modifications to the versioned files, what
are those?
--
compo
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Windows
nosy: +paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
Change by SilentGhost :
--
type: compile error -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41064>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +ned.deily, ronaldoussoren
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41005>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
SilentGhost added the comment:
This looks like a duplicate of #37527.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost, belopolsky, p-ganssle
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Timestamp conversion on windows fails with timestamps clo
SilentGhost added the comment:
This isn't a problem, this is how floating number implemented in Python and
many other languages. Please read the linked detailed explanation and do not
re-open the ticket.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
status: open ->
Change by SilentGhost :
--
assignee: -> docs@python
components: +Documentation -Library (Lib)
nosy: +docs@python
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +orsenthil
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40968>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
SilentGhost added the comment:
This is the result of removal of platform.linux_distribution() in #28167. Which
was deprecated since 3.5. As far as I understand, suggested replacement is
distro package on pypi (https://pypi.org/project/distro/).
--
nosy: +SilentGhost, petr.viktorin
SilentGhost added the comment:
> subprocess somehow gets a hold of the underlying file descriptor pointing to
> the compressed file, and ends up being fed the compressed bytes
That is exactly what happens, and I'd wager this is not going to change. You
could easily pass the de
SilentGhost added the comment:
I don't think your suggestion improve readability there. I think explanation
following the code example does a decent job without being overly verbose.
Regarding, memoization, it is mentioned in [0], right after describing the
technique. So, I'm no
SilentGhost added the comment:
I took it from your msg370615:
> of even more reliable
> Execute '\u13e3\u13b3\u13a9'.encode('idna')
--
___
Python tracker
<https
SilentGhost added the comment:
For the record:
>>> 'ꮳꮃꭹ'.encode('punycode')
b'tz9ata7l'
>>> '\u13e3\u13b3\u13a9'.encode('punycode')
b'f9dt7l'
Also, your unicode-escaped string
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +eric.snow
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40834>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +davin, pitrou
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40828>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +rhettinger
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
SilentGhost added the comment:
I think I would have to leave judgement on that to core developers. This, if
accepted, would be a candidate for 3.10.
--
versions: +Python 3.10 -Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
SilentGhost added the comment:
You seem to have read the docs, so I'm a bit confused why you think that is a
bug. According to
https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp
> fromtimestamp() may raise OverflowError, if the timestamp is out of t
Change by SilentGhost :
--
resolution: -> third party
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python
SilentGhost added the comment:
Serhiy, would you be interested in converting your patch to a PR?
--
versions: +Python 3.10
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue27
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, meador.inge, vinay.sajip
versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
SilentGhost added the comment:
What would it do?
--
nosy: +SilentGhost, pitrou
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40752>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Library (Lib)
nosy: +pitrou
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
SilentGhost added the comment:
Did you try running that? The documentation is correct, dropwhile works
differently than filter.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
type: -&
Change by SilentGhost :
--
type: enhancement -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8 -Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
SilentGhost added the comment:
The output in REPL is valid representation of an object that can be often be
used to re-create the object, you could use print function to see how the
string would look like when output on screen or written into a file.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution
SilentGhost added the comment:
This looks like a proposed "enhancement" rather than a bug report.
Unfortunately, this is not possible for a myriad of reasons, from backward
compatibility to overall use of mutating methods in Python.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -
SilentGhost added the comment:
What is the use-case for this new method?
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40316>
___
___
Change by SilentGhost :
--
pull_requests: -16955
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue1490384>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
SilentGhost added the comment:
Michael, could you try with the latest fix in 584a3cfda4?
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Extension Modules, Windows
nosy: +paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
stage: -> test needed
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
SilentGhost added the comment:
This should have been fixed already in #39953. Do re-open, if you can reproduce
this with the latest checkouts.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Let's updat
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +brandtbucher
stage: -> needs patch
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40260>
___
___
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +christian.heimes
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39951>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
type: crash -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40256>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
Change by SilentGhost :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg356223
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32545>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg361403
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36199>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg361686
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39598>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg362378
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39598>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Change by SilentGhost :
--
Removed message: https://bugs.python.org/msg366099
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39598>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
SilentGhost added the comment:
Hi Fernando,
the first parameter of the connect function is described in documentation as
follows:
> database is a path-like object giving the pathname (absolute or relative to
> the current working directory) of the database file to be opened. You c
SilentGhost added the comment:
Various meanings are documented in appropriate sections, ignoring and use in
loops is a misunderstanding on part of the author - using underscore there is
convention and doesn't have special meaning on the language level.
--
nosy: +Silent
Change by SilentGhost :
--
versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40124>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +pitrou
type: -> enhancement
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40148>
___
___
Python-
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40076>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
SilentGhost added the comment:
Yes, I was also able to verify this issue on 3.8.2 on win10. Argument to
astimezone is not required, and this happens for both naïve and aware objects.
--
nosy: +belopolsky, p-ganssle
resolution: duplicate ->
stage: resolved -> test needed
SilentGhost added the comment:
Leon, this most likely is not a bug, not because what's stated in
documentation, but because you're most likely not testing what you think you
do. Here is the test that you should be doing:
>>> re.match(r'(<)?(\w+@\w+(?:\.\w+)+)(?
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +davin, pitrou
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40039>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +Ion SKALAMERA
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by SilentGhost :
--
versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21031>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by SilentGhost :
--
assignee: docs@python ->
components: -2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool), Documentation
resolution: -> third party
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python
Change by SilentGhost :
--
superseder: -> email parseaddr and formataddr should be IDNA aware
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39757>
___
_
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Library (Lib) -Cross-Build
resolution: -> duplicate
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> bad input crashes py_compile library
type: -> behavior
___
Python
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +corona10, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39737>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
SilentGhost added the comment:
Hi, this is a wrong bug tracker. You can report numpy issues at
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues and scipy one's at
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -> third party
stage: -> resolved
status: ope
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
type: behavior -> enhancement
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
SilentGhost added the comment:
Your PRs are missing documentation and tests.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35885>
___
___
Python-bug
Change by SilentGhost :
--
priority: normal -> high
stage: -> needs patch
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39730>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +steve.dower
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39723>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.9
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
SilentGhost added the comment:
You could (should?) use reduce, then:
>>> functools.reduce(math.gcd, (6, 30, 40, 60, 20, 40))
2
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.5, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
SilentGhost added the comment:
>>> 0b1110 + 0b1010
24
>>> bin(0b1110 + 0b1010)
'0b11000'
Can you explain how this is not enough?
--
___
Python tracker
<htt
SilentGhost added the comment:
Ananthakrishnan, you've marked this issue as belonging to C API component, why?
Besides, all this functionality is already present in python, what is it you're
actually interested in? What is not covered by the independent packages on pypi?
-
SilentGhost added the comment:
Bruce, error message says exactly why it doesn't work: you're trying to add a
tuple to a list, and that doesn't work. There isn't a "third" string created
anywhere, you're confused about the types of the objects. Also, pl
Change by SilentGhost :
--
components: +Interpreter Core
nosy: +vstinner
versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +gpolo, serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39642>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +Ananthakrishnan
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39644>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +pitrou
versions: +Python 3.9 -Python 3.7
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31116>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +davin, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39584>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
SilentGhost added the comment:
SyntaxError is produced when there is a syntax problem in the code to be
executed, this code is fine from the syntax perspective, so this particular
error would not be raised.
It is also perfectly fine to have a function call where you have it, the only
thing
SilentGhost added the comment:
I would suggest adding indent parameter to the write method, it would default
to an empty string and could be used directly in the formatting operation.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<ht
SilentGhost added the comment:
"Successful" PR would be merged into master. This issue is still in "patch
review" stage.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
___
Python tracker
<https://bug
Change by SilentGhost :
--
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39526>
___
___
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: -bup
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
SilentGhost added the comment:
Your 3.8.0 numbers are similar to 3.8.1
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Build
nosy: +SilentGhost, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39
SilentGhost added the comment:
`pip install --help` provides full list of options, the upgrade option is -U or
--upgrade.
--
nosy: +SilentGhost
resolution: -> not a bug
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
type: security -&
Change by SilentGhost :
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39486>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
1 - 100 of 1410 matches
Mail list logo