Steve Newcomb added the comment:
Sometimes a leak is exactly what's wanted, i.e. a standing block of shared
memory that allows sharing processes come and go ad libitum. I mention this
because I haven't seen anyone mention it explicitly.
While turicas's monkeypatch covers
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
The documentation, which needs some improvement, I think. I'll suggest some
improvements when I understand things a little better.
For the record, it turned out that SharedMemoryManager was irrelevant, as were
sockets. That makes sense since memory
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
And again with 3.8.8, with the same result.
I also tried just using the same shared memory manager again within the same
process, just as shown in the documentation. Same result:
TypeError: ShareableList() got an unexpected keyword argument 'name
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
I just tried the same thing on Python-3.10.0a6. Same behavior.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43
New submission from Steve Newcomb :
This is especially weird because the Python source code says:
class ShareableList:
[...]
def __init__(self, sequence=None, *, name=None):
--
components: Library (Lib)
files: shareableListBug.txt
messages: 390080
nosy: steve.newcomb
priority
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
I'm very grateful for your time and attention, and sorry to have distracted
you. You're correct when you say:
Steven D'Aprano: ...the rightmost alternative matches from position 1 of the
text, while the leftmost alternative doesn't ma
New submission from Steve Newcomb :
Documentation for the re module insists that matches are made left-to-right
within the alternatives delimited by an "or* | group. I seem to have found a
case where the rightmost alternative is matched unless it (and only it) is
commented out.
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
Oops. My bad. There was a symlink in one of those paths. The message is
valid.
--
resolution: -> not a bug
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Steve Newcomb:
os.rename() raises OSError with a misleading message saying "cross-device" when
no cross-device activity is involved.
Here, running on Ubuntu 16.04.1 using and ext4 filesystem, both filepaths are
in the same filesystem, and the error is eviden
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
Context reporting is still buggy in Python 3.5.2:
>>> [ x for x in difflib.unified_diff( "'on'\n", "'on'\n\n\n")]
['--- \n', '+++ \n', '@@ -3,3 +3,5 @@\n', ' n', "
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
On 08/30/2016 12:46 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> It would be helpful if you ... make a small set of regular expressions that
> demonstrate the performance regression.
>
Done. Attachments:
test.py : Code
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
On 09/01/2016 05:01 PM, Steve Newcomb wrote:
>
>> The outputs show that 2.7.12's re.sub() takes 1.2 times as long as
>> 2.7.6's. It's a significant difference, but...
>>
>> ...it was not the dramatic degradation I
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
Oops. The correct url is sftp://coolheads.com/files/py-re-perform-276v2712/
On 09/01/2016 04:52 PM, Steve Newcomb wrote:
> On 08/30/2016 12:46 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>>
>> It would be helpful if
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
On 08/30/2016 01:24 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> According to your profile results all re functions are 2.5-4 times faster
> under 2.7.12 than under 2.7.6. May be I misinterpret it?
I can't explain the
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
On 08/30/2016 12:46 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> It would be helpful if you could run "hg bisect" with your set-up to isolate
> the change that causes the problem.
I don't think I understand
New submission from Steve Newcomb:
Our most regular-expression-processing-intensive Python 2.7 code takes 2.5x
more execution time in 2.7.12 than it did in 2.7.6. I discovered this after
upgrading from Ubuntu 14.04 to Ubuntu 16.04. Basically this code runs
thousands of compiled regular
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
> I preferred the previous example "" because it's not obvious what
> \042\047 is.
Yeah, but the example I wrote has an in-pattern backreference and a real reason
to use one.
In the attached patch, I have changed [\042\047] to [\&#
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
> But this way exists: (?P=startquote) is what you want.
I know how I missed it: I searched for "backref" in the documentation. I did
not find it in the discussion of the pattern language, because that word does
not appear where contribution
Steve Newcomb added the comment:
I have re-read the documentation on re.sub(). Even now, now that I understand
that the \g syntax applies to the repl argument only, I cannot see
how the documentation can be understood that way. The paragraph in which the
explanation of the \g syntax appears
New submission from Steve Newcomb:
The '\\g' in the below does not work:
>>> repr( re.compile( '\\<\\!ENTITY[ \\011\\012\\015]+\\%[
>>> \\011\\012\\015]*(?P[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9\\.\\-\\_\\:]*)[
>>> \\011\\012\\015]*(?P[\\042\\047])(?P.+?)\\g[
>>
20 matches
Mail list logo
