Steven Warwick added the comment:
sorry, I meant the following:
logger.info( " {:s} {:s} ".format(logger.name, logger.module ) )
or
logger.info( f" {logger.name:s} {logger.module:s} " )
this could be supported with full backward compatibility with very little
effo
Steven Warwick added the comment:
you probably have already considered this, but I just wanted to ask if it might
be worth considering turning the problem "upside down" to make things easier.
I'm interpreting the problem that there are variables we'd like to add to the
