Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
A patch for 3.5 attached.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43292/issue25738_http_reset_content_3.5_02.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Great, thanks for checking. Attaching patch for 2.7. 3.5 will follow.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43291/issue25738_http_reset_content_2.7_02.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Thanks for the suggestions, I've updated the test cases and created a patch for
3.6.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43277/issue25738_http_reset_content_07.patch
___
Python tracker
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Ah yes, you are right. I didn't think about the cases where it will send HEAD
for codes like 204(No Content). I've created a patch for 3.6 to see if this
looks reasonable, if review passes, I'll create patches for the rest of the
releases.
T
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
3.6 patch(..._05.patch file)
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43225/issue25738_http_reset_content_05.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
3.5 patch.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43224/issue25738_http_reset_content_3.5_01.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Thanks, makes sense to me.
I've created patches for 2.7, 3.5, 3.6. 3.5's implementation looked slightly
different from 3.6 so I've decided to create a separate patch, just in case. I
will upload them 1 by 1 starting with 2.7. It will get a
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Thanks again for valuable comments.
I agree that there could be a case where send_error() gets used for both HEAD
and GET, in which case we could send content-length field as an optional field.
However, if send_error() is not used for both HEAD and GET, then
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Sorry, re-created a patch to do the right word wrapping and made my comments
less verbose.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43204/issue25738_http_reset_content_04.patch
___
Python tracker
<h
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Thanks a lot for a quick review. I've created a new patch with below changes.
1. No content-length and the body to be sent for:
a. 204(No Content)
b. 205(Reset Content)
c. 304(Not Modified)
d. response to HEAD request method
e. 1
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Thanks,
I've added some comments to the doc and updated the patch.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file43182/issue25738_http_reset_content_02.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/is
Susumu Koshiba added the comment:
Patched the behaviors when NO_CONTENT and RESET_CONTENT are sent via
send_error(). According to RFCs, they aren't actually errors so sending them
through send_response() seems to make the most sense, however.
send_error()'s behavior changes in this
12 matches
Mail list logo
