New submission from alex0307: In the doc for itertools, the python implementation of islice() doesn't actually perform the iteration when given an empty slice (e.g. islice(it,3,3)).
This is not the expected behavior for 'consume()' in the recipe given below, i.e. consume(it,3) couldn't actually advance the iterator for 3 steps ahead. Instead, the iterator stays at its starting position. As a simple fix, in the implementation of islice(), the length of the slice object should be checked first. If it's zero, the iterator should be advanced (slice.start-1) times, and return (See islice_my.py) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: islice_my.py messages: 267236 nosy: alex0307, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Doc for itertools, 'islice()' implementation have unwanted behavior for recipe 'consume()' type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43184/islice_my.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27212> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
