fumihiko kakuma added the comment:
Thank you in advance.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21600
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
fumihiko kakuma added the comment:
Hi michael,
Certainly, thank you for your many advices. I attached the new patch file.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35513/support_patch_dict_by_stopall.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
fumihiko kakuma added the comment:
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, you are right. The patch was too slapdash. I re-created it and added unit
tests.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35499/support_patch_dict_by_stopall.diff
___
Python tracker
fumihiko kakuma added the comment:
Checking mock.py(version 1.0.1) it seems that patch.stopall does not support
patch.dict. Does it have any problem to support ptch.dict by stopall.
I made the attached patch file for this. It seems to work well. How about this?
But I don't know why sys.modules
New submission from fumihiko kakuma:
It seems that stopall doesn't work when do start patch.dict to sys.modules.
I show sample scripts the following.
Using stopall test case seems to always refer the first mock foo object.
But using stop it refers a new mock foo object.
$ cat test_sampmod.py
