New submission from Ivo Grondman :
Using the TimedRotatingFileHandler with a non-zero backupCount, I get different
behaviour between versions 3.9 and 3.10.
Attached is a small example. Running it with 3.9 gives me two backups at most
even if I run the script for a long time. Running it with
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
Yes, I get it now. I've missed the idea. You can do:
> age = tk.IntVar(value=38, name="mine")
> age_str = tk.StringVar(name="mine")
> is_alive = tk.BooleanVar(name="mine")
> is_alive.get()
True
Maybe not the bes
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
"I personally think that being able to compare whether two tkinter variables
point to the same Tk variable is very useful so needs to stay in some form." --
I concur.
"However, I don't see any situation where comparing to see if two tk
Change by Ivo Shipkaliev :
--
title: tkinter.Variable equality consistency -> tkinter.Variable equality
inconsistency
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
2. (continued) .. This is including the case when both variables have the same
internal name (the current implementation).
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
There are 2 good reasons for making Tk variables comparable by value:
1. We honor the equality operator! The equality operator (==) has to compare
two objects by value. The current implementation does not fulfil this. Yes, if
two Tk variables have the
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
If it's gonna break existing code -- fine. I just wanted to point out that if
two variables are of the same type and refer to the same value, they should be
considered equal, even if they are not the same variable.
In the current implementation, two St
New submission from Ivo Shipkaliev :
Greetings!
I just noticed:
>>> import tkinter as tk
>>> root = tk.Tk()
>>> str_0 = tk.StringVar()
>>> str_0.set("same value")
>>> str_1 = tk.StringVar()
>>> str_1.set("same value")
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42672>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Ivo Shipkaliev :
--
components: Tkinter
files: default_root.diff
keywords: patch
nosy: shippo_
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: tkinter/__init__.py raises a NameError if NoDefaultRoot()
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.10
Added file: https
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
First: thank you!
> I think Serhiy has done a very good job ...
I'm not saying he ain't! More so, I greatly appreciate everyone's time and
effort. But I'm discussing the implementation here, not somebody's work.
Apparently I ha
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
Thank you very much, fellows!
Serhiy, I'm lloking at Lib/tkinter/__init__.py changes. I'd like to share my
thoughts on this:
I understand your concern: "But I am not sure what is better: raise error
(RuntimeError) if the global function use
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
"Attached is a diff which ..." -- Much nicer!
Are you gonna submit a PR so I can eventually use _setup_master() in my PR?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.o
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
The current implementation is already relying on _some_ master anyway:
335 > self._root = master._root()
So, initializing a default root, if one isn't present, shouldn't break
anything. And reusing setup_master() is a good idea. Maybe:
Change by Ivo Shipkaliev :
--
resolution: works for me ->
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42630>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Un
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
Sorry, we need "global" too:
333 > if not master:
334 > global _default_root
335 > if not _default_root:
336 > _default_root = Tk()
337 > master = _default_root
338 >
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
Or maybe:
333 > if not master:
334 > if not _default_root:
335 > _default_root = Tk()
336 > master = _default_root
337 > self._root = master._root()
--
title: Variable._
Ivo Shipkaliev added the comment:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-id...@python.org/thread/FSQUFJJQDNSRN4HI7VFXWCNO46YLXQDS/
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42
New submission from Ivo Shipkaliev :
Hello.
I think it would be nice to add:
335 > if not master:
336 > raise RuntimeError('a valid Tk instance is required.')
to lib/tkinter/__init__.py, and not rely on this unclear AttributeError.
Could it b
New submission from Ivo van der Wijk :
This issue is also discussed on Stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/3828611/320057
The following code
def top(deck):
pass
def b():
global deck
results in the error "SyntaxError: name 'deck' is local and global" (sligh
New submission from Ivo Danihelka :
There is a misleading documentation for module sched.
Method scheduler.cancel() does not raise RuntimeError.
It raises ValueError if the given event is not in the queue.
The RuntimeError is mentioned inside the module documentation
and also inside the method
New submission from ivo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I tested metode urllib2.read() on 2000 web_pages and there was a
exception ValueError in only one case, here is short code:
import urllib2
req = urllib2.urlopen('http://www.peachbit.org/')
req.read()
Traceback (most recent ca
22 matches
Mail list logo
