[issue36207] robotsparser deny all with some rules

Nico added the comment: Had same problem today for my website (https://www.bonus4casino.fr/), following for a fix -- nosy: +nico.bonefato ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36

[issue43786] slice(None) is slice(None) is False

Nico Schlömer added the comment: Thanks very much, Steven, for the feedback and the suggestion. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43

[issue43786] slice(None) is slice(None) is False

New submission from Nico Schlömer : I stumbled upon this when dealing with NumPy arrays: ``` slice(None) is slice(None) ``` ``` False ``` This came up when trying to check if a variable `a` equals `slice(None)`. The comparison ``` a = slice(None) a == slice(None) ``` ``` True ``` works

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Nico added the comment: Yeah I see the point. To me it does make no sense because even in the windows API they seam to not know whether to use a ulong or a uint nor does this reflect the actual depiction within the program. However it is probably not worth implementing a flag for that nor

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Nico added the comment: We apparently need a flag to ensure compatibility with the windows return codes == FAIL: test_disable_windows_exc_handler (test.test_faulthandler.FaultHandlerTests

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Nico added the comment: I don't know if it should be a good idea to add a flag to turn off the negative conversation? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Change by Nico : -- versions: -Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41386> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Change by Nico : -- components: +Library (Lib) -Windows ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue41386> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

Nico added the comment: I suggest implementing a singed conversation into _wait -- keywords: +patch message_count: 1.0 -> 2.0 pull_requests: +20749 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21607 ___

[issue41386] Popen.wait does not account for negative return codes

New submission from Nico : Following problem occurred. A C style program can have negative return codes. However this is not correctly implemented in the Windows API. Therefore it is being returned as unsigned long by the API hence it leads to ambiguity while comparing return codes

[issue31415] Add -X option to show import time

Nico Schlömer added the comment: I just updated tuna [1] to support import time profiles as well. Install with ``` pip install tuna ``` and use with ``` python -X importprofile yourfile.py 2> import.log tuna import.log ``` See screenshot for example output. Cheers, Nico [1] https://github.

[issue29282] Fused multiply-add: proposal to add math.fma()

Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com> added the comment: Okay, thanks for the info. As a stop-gap measure, I've created pyfma [1, 2]. Install with ``` pip install pyfma ``` and use with ``` pyfma.fma(3.0, 2.0, 1.0) ``` Only works on Unix reliable then, but that's all I care about. :)

[issue29282] Fused multiply-add: proposal to add math.fma()

Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Existing libm implementations don't work, Okay. Is this because of the inf/NaN discrimination hiccups mentioned above or are there any other pitfalls? -- ___ Python tra

[issue29282] Fused multiply-add: proposal to add math.fma()

Nico Schlömer <nico.schloe...@gmail.com> added the comment: Do I read this thread correctly assuming that this hasn't been implemented yet? If not, I would probably make my own little library for this -- I really need the feature for the precision. -- nosy: +n

[issue29522] PyLong_AsDouble Behaviour is Weird

New submission from nico: I'm using the pre-installed version of Python 2.7.12 on Ubuntu 16.04. Pretty straight forward error the following code: PyObject * intobj = PyInt_FromLong(10); double d1 = (double)PyLong_AsLong(intobj); double d2 = PyLong_AsDouble(intobj); printf("Should be the

[issue9720] zipfile writes incorrect local file header for large files in zip64

Nico Möller added the comment: I most definitely need a patch for 2.7.3 Would be awesome if you could provide a patch for that version. -- nosy: +Nico.Möller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9720

[issue8609] itertools: problem with nested groupby, list()

New submission from Nico nico.schloe...@gmail.com: Hi, I ran into a bit of an unexpected issue here with itertools. I need to say that I discovered itertools only recently, and that maybe my way of approaching the problem is not what I want to do. If you think this may be the case, please

[issue8609] itertools: problem with nested groupby, list()

Nico nico.schloe...@gmail.com added the comment: Okay, thanks for the hint. Closing as invalid. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8609