[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Root
Benjamin Root added the comment: What was the issue number for the python2.7 fix? I think I have hit upon this issue myself and I need to see if I need to file a new report. -- nosy: +Benjamin.Root ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2013-10-14 Thread Benjamin Root
Benjamin Root added the comment: To clarify, the bug is resolved in py2.7 -- for the most part. I think I have come upon an edge-case where if the archived symbolic link refers to a file not contained in a subdirectory, say: foo.txt - foobar.txt, extracting foo.txt would result in an

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-12-05 Thread Lars Gustäbel
Lars Gustäbel l...@gustaebel.de added the comment: Okay, this bug has been fixed in the 2.7 series. Python 2.6 is now in security-fix-only mode which means that there will not be a fix for it. Therefore, I close this issue. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed versions:

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-20 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10292 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-02 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de: -- assignee: - lars.gustaebel nosy: +lars.gustaebel ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10292 ___

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-02 Thread Lars Gustäbel
Lars Gustäbel l...@gustaebel.de added the comment: Apparently you were in quite a hurry when you filed this bug report. - What is the exact problem and how does it manifest itself? - Any helpful details (tracebacks, output)? - Is there a testcase or example code you can provide? - Which other

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-02 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net added the comment: Oh man, attaching the wrong diff and getting the diff wrong. The issue I found with Python 2.7: when creating a simple link in tar: $ mkdir tar_test $ cd tar_test $ touch one $ ln -s one two $ cd .. $ tar czf tar_test.tgz tar_test It

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-02 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net added the comment: Uh, I just noticed the python2.6 in the traceback. Looks like I *was* using 2.6 because Cygwin decided to downgrade for some reason. Uh, sorry about that. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-01 Thread JP St. Pierre
New submission from JP St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net: With all the tools I've used, the target of a symlink appears to be relative to the actual symlink entry. Fix this. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 120208 nosy: magcius priority: normal severity: normal status: open title:

[issue10292] tarinfo should use relative symlinks

2010-11-01 Thread JP St. Pierre
Changes by JP St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19462/tarinfo-10292.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10292 ___