Mariatta Wijaya added the comment:
This is out of date. I'm closing it.
Thanks.
--
nosy: +Mariatta
resolution: -> out of date
stage: needs patch -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
Cheryl Sabella added the comment:
Since `blurb` says to write a simple ReST paragraph and that is code reviewed
with the PR, is this issue still needed?
--
nosy: +csabella
___
Python tracker
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Alternatively, make patchcheck could print “Did you build the docs?”, just as
it currently prints “Did you run the test suite?” if C or Python files were
modified. Building the docs would not check Misc/NEWS, the original motivation
for this
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
versions: -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
rst2html doesn't help, since it doesn't recognize Sphinx' and Python's own
markup extensions.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Have a look at Doc/tools/rstlint.py
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10507
___
New submission from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
Misc/NEWS needs to be valid reST.
Issue 10450 identified an issue where it wasn't.
make patchcheck potentially could check the markup of that file, and,
potentially all the other places in the source tree that are supposed to be
valid