[issue1055] argument parsing in datetime_strptime

2007-08-29 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Should be fixed by r57665. I'm guessing we went a little too fast with this change. -- nosy: +gvanrossum resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1055] argument parsing in datetime_strptime

2007-08-29 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis: -- priority: -> normal __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://ma

[issue1055] argument parsing in datetime_strptime

2007-08-29 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis: -- nosy: -gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail

[issue1055] argument parsing in datetime_strptime

2007-08-29 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis: -- nosy: +gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.

[issue1055] argument parsing in datetime_strptime

2007-08-29 Thread Martin v. Löwis
New submission from Martin v. Löwis: In r57374, the ParseTuple string for datetime_strptime was changed from ss:datetime to uu:datetime, without adjusting the output arguments. It's not clear to me what the rationale of this change was; it is incorrect as u outputs Py_UNICODE, not char.