Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Fixed in r87536.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10609
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Why not replace it with an example that uses get() or setdefault() then?
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10609
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
IMO, wrapping db in a dict defeats the purpose of dbm implementing a mapping
interface. I would use the most natural mapping idioms:
- for k, v in db.iteritems():
- print(k, '\t', v)
+ for k in db:
+ print(k, '\t', db[k])
The
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Arg, the internal classes returned by dbm.*.open have keys but not necessarily
items. See #9523, #6045 and #5736.
The docs should be fixed independently of that, with the less non-idiomatic
code that we can find. Do you want to check the dbm
New submission from Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com:
Following http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2010-December/002356.html a
possible solution is:
diff -r 3b07f7bb0289 Doc/library/dbm.rst
--- a/Doc/library/dbm.rst Thu Dec 02 19:29:18 2010 +0100
+++ b/Doc/library/dbm.rst Thu
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Isn’t s/iteritems/items/ enough?
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10609
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
assignee: - d...@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +d...@python
stage: - needs patch
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10609
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Eric,
on and up-to-date py3k I got this:
for k, v in db.items():
... print(k, '\t', v)
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
AttributeError: '_dbm.dbm' object has no attribute 'items'
'items' in
