Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Backported to 3.1 in r88562, 2.7 in r88569.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
assignee: - georg.brandl
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Okay, committed to py3k in r88440. Does this need backporting?
--
resolution: - fixed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Okay, committed to py3k in r88440. Does this need backporting?
Certainly.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Sébastien Sablé sa...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Here is the patch.
It only impacts AIX systems and is minimalist, so I think it should be safe for
Python 3.2.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20767/patch_aix_largefile.diff
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Antoine, do you agree? I don't want waves of AIX changes going into 3.2 now...
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Assuming it doesn't break other platforms, I'm fine with it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
This looks to be a low risk fix-up (confined to an if $use_lfs block in
configure.in and further guarded with a case statement restricting it to AIX
builds).
--
nosy: +rhettinger
Changes by Sébastien Sablé sa...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
title: test_io error on AIX - Broken large file support on AIX
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11184
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Yes, I think the skipping code in test_largefile should be factored out and
used both in test_io and test_largefile (to be honest I don't know why test_io
has large file tests as well; perhaps I should merge them together).
--
stage: -
Sébastien Sablé sa...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Also:
is it OK if I open a new issue for each broken unit test on AIX even if I have
not investigated them at the moment?
I have a dozen broken unit tests on AIX that need to be investigated, but I
don't want to spam the bug
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
is it OK if I open a new issue for each broken unit test on AIX even
if I have not investigated them at the moment?
Yes. That way they get recorded somewhere and other people can chime in.
If you plan to investigate them you can add a sentence
13 matches
Mail list logo
