[issue11692] subprocess demo functions

2011-03-27 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: OK, I simply removed the functions. -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker __

[issue11692] subprocess demo functions

2011-03-27 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset cae30f34bd16 by Ross Lagerwall in branch 'default': Issue #11692: Remove unnecessary demo functions in subprocess module. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cae30f34bd16 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tra

[issue11692] subprocess demo functions

2011-03-27 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: Yeah, +1. I can't think of anything useful for "python -m subprocess" to do, so let's just get rid of the "demo"s. -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker __

[issue11692] subprocess demo functions

2011-03-27 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > I think these demo functions should be either be removed or > incorporated into the docs. +1 for either of that. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker ___

[issue11692] subprocess demo functions

2011-03-27 Thread Ross Lagerwall
New submission from Ross Lagerwall : Running subprocess as a module invokes some demo functions. On posix, one of these doesn't work: $ ./python -m subprocess Process list: b' PID TTY TIME CMD\n 9003 pts/600:00:00 python\n 9004 pts/6 00:00:00 ps\n23760 pts/600:00:00 bash\n