[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-07-29 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: The module docstring (which duplicates the reST docs) still mentions list2cmdline. I’d vote for removal there too. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11827

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-29 Thread Eli Bendersky
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-14 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment: New changeset e7a55e236b8b by Eli Bendersky in branch '3.1': Issue #11827: remove mention of list2cmdline in the doc of subprocess http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e7a55e236b8b -- nosy: +python-dev ___

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-14 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment: New changeset f38489a3394f by Eli Bendersky in branch '2.7': Issue #11827: remove mention of list2cmdline in the doc of subprocess http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f38489a3394f -- ___ Python tracker

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-14 Thread Eli Bendersky
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-14 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Patch committed to 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 2.7 In case no objections arise, I will close this issue in a couple of days -- status: pending - open ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-13 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: LGTM. -- versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11827 ___

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-12 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment: If a _ is added to list2cmdline the old name should be kept and deprecated. The function is also on 2.x and it's not deprecated there (and it's probably too late to deprecate it now), so we might have to wait a few versions before it will

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-12 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11827 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-12 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Attaching a proposed patch for 3.2, focusing only on the documentation for the time being (I realize that deprecation is a loaded issue and should be probably handled in a centralized manner). The patch removes mention of list2cmdline, instead

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread Eli Bendersky
New submission from Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: The documentation of subprocess.Popen mentions a function named list2cmdline(): On Windows: the Popen class uses CreateProcess() to execute the child program, which operates on strings. If args is a sequence, it will be converted to a

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: I vote for (2) (I presume 'it' in that sentence is 'subprocess'). list2cmdline shouldn't be a real public method, at least not without the issues surrounding being given careful design attention. -- nosy: +r.david.murray

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: I also prefer (2) since I see no reason for the user to use list2cmdline() directly, let alone from subprocess (had there been rationale for such a public function it should probably be in another module). As for 'it', I guess you can say it

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Ah, right. I guess I was advocating that the docs be written from the perspective that list2cmdline doesn't exist as an identifiable entity. From the POV of the updated docs, it is just subprocess's behavior, and list2cmdline is an

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment: #10838 has a bit of discussion about list2cmdline and being part of the public api (generally agreeing that it should be made private, I think). -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker

[issue11827] mention of list2cmdline() in docs of subprocess.Popen

2011-04-11 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks for the pointer, Ross. So I propose to remove the mention of list2cmdline from the documentation of subprocess, explaining instead what it does to the path (since I think this should be publicly known, otherwise it's just black magic).