[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2018-02-01 Thread Stéphane Wirtel
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: I close this issue because we are in 2018 and the issue was rejected by Antoine in 2014. -- ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2018-02-01 Thread Stéphane Wirtel
Change by Stéphane Wirtel : -- stage: -> resolved status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2014-10-15 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Development of simplejson and the standard json module has diverged. We may port selected fixes and features from simplejson, but I don't think a wholesale update is doable anymore. Please open separate issues for each feature you would like to see added to th

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2014-10-15 Thread Stéphane Wirtel
Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: Hi all, ping this issue for Python 3.5. -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-13 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: See also issue16535. I doubt that json should support decimals in this manner, with special boolean parameter instead of general fabric function. Current simlejson has too many special parameters. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka _

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-13 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Is there any reason why the two codebases are maintained separately instead of being kept in sync? (and what's the reason for simplejson to be still maintained? faster release cycles? compatibility with older Python versions?) -- __

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Which simplejson features or fixes exactly are missing from the json module? -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-13 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscri

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-11 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: Short of doing an actual merge I don't think so, Bob. Thanks for the changes! Sandro, feel free to do any merge you were planning to do. -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-11 Thread Bob Ippolito
Bob Ippolito added the comment: To try and make this as painless as possible I have done both things. simplejson is now explicitly dual-licensed MIT or AFL v2.1 and there is also an explicit sentence in LICENSE.txt that states "This code is also licensed to the Python Software Foundation (PSF)

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2013-01-11 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: What is the status of this, Sandro? Are we still out of sync? If so and it's a licensing issue I can get legal clarification for whatever we need. -- status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2011-04-15 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: .. > That's not a problem, I'm more than happy to give permission for any patch. > If it's easier I can consider dual-licensing in the simplejson source. Can someone who can speak for PSF clarify the

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2011-04-15 Thread Bob Ippolito
Bob Ippolito added the comment: That's not a problem, I'm more than happy to give permission for any patch. If it's easier I can consider dual-licensing in the simplejson source. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2011-04-15 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: I am not sure anyone other that Bob Ippolito can contribute later versions of simplejson (or patches derived from those versions) to python. ISTM that simplejson distribution is covered by MIT license [1] which is not one of the valid "initial licenses.

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2011-04-14 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +ezio.melotti, fdrake ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:/

[issue11844] Update json to upstream simplejson latest release

2011-04-14 Thread Sandro Tosi
New submission from Sandro Tosi : This issue is to track the update process of json to the latest upstream release (2.1.3). As a start, here's the p-dev thread: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-April/110704.html -- assignee: sandro.tosi components: Library (Lib) messag