Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Closing this as duplicate of #6560.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
resolution: - duplicate
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Guillaume Desmottes gdesm...@gnome.org:
--
nosy: +gdesmott
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1194378
___
___
Changes by Forest Wilkinson for...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +forest
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1194378
___
___
David M. Beazley beaz...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Just a followup comment to note that adding support for
sendmsg()/recvmsg() is what you need to do file descriptor passing
between processes on Unix---another technique for writing network servers.
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The patch doesn't apply cleanly to the current trunk (which is
understandable, given the patch is from 2005). Also, some tests would be
welcome as Thomas said. And bonus points for documentation :)
--
nosy: +pitrou
stage: - needs patch
David M. Beazley beaz...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Bump. This functionality seems to be needed if anyone is going to be
messing around with advanced features of IPv6. As it stands, the socket
module in Python 2.6/3.0 is incomplete without this.
--
nosy: +beazley
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' billiej...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1194378
___
