[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-30 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- stage: patch review - committed/rejected ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___ ___

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-30 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset 8862ec62f9ee by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2': #12531: Fix spaces and markup. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8862ec62f9ee New changeset b47c9982506c by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default': #12531: merge with 3.2.

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset 8328fe952303 by Eli Bendersky in branch '2.7': Issue #12531: add index entries to documentation of * and ** in function calls http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8328fe952303 -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: I've committed a fix into 2.7, taking Terry's advice (in function calls subsection instead of statement) and Eric's sequence/iterable correction into account. If this looks OK, I will commit a similar fix to the 3.x branches as well.

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Looks good to me. One tip for commits: it’s often better to let a line exceed 80 characters in order to make for a smaller diff. Here, only one word was changed but four lines were marked as changed, which makes reviews longer. Lines are

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Éric - when I was just starting contributing patches to Python, I was strictly disciplined by veteran devs to stay within 80 chars no matter what :-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset a8aa918041c2 by Eli Bendersky in branch '3.2': Issue #12531: add index entries to documentation of * and ** in function calls http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a8aa918041c2 New changeset 221ca00121ef by Eli Bendersky

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-29 Thread Eli Bendersky
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-19 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Peter, would you like to submit a corrected patch? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: [...] If the syntax *expression appears in the function call, expression must evaluate to a sequence. An iterable :) -- nosy: +eric.araujo -ericsnow, terry.reedy versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.2

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +ericsnow, terry.reedy versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-18 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: I would not propose to do everything in one grand patch as it would be way too much to review all at once. A somewhat separate subissue is whether there should be however many separate issues over the next however many years or one master

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-18 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: expression must evaluate to a sequence. To be clear, Eli quoted the doc correctly and Eric correctly suggested that 'sequence' needs to be updated to 'iterable' (in at least two places). Since the patch for this issue will be adding

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-16 Thread Eli Bendersky
Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com added the comment: Peter, doesn't your patch also refer to the meaning of * and ** in function definitions? I would argue that the missing reference is to a paragraph further down: [...] If the syntax *expression appears in the function call, expression

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-15 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: This is just the tip of the iceberg as far as needed symbol index entries goes. Nearly 3 years ago, I wrote a Python 3 symbol glossary Python3 Syntax Symbol Uses that was complete as far as I knew then. I think most of the entries there

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-15 Thread Eric Snow
Changes by Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ericsnow ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-13 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___ ___

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-12 Thread Eli Bendersky
Changes by Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +eli.bendersky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12531 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue12531] documentation index entries for * and **

2011-07-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
New submission from Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net: The existing documentation index entries for * and ** only point to their use in function definitions but not to their use in function calls. I was looking for the latter, and it was difficult to find without this. Here is a small patch