Steve Dower added the comment:
Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being
closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered
for distutils.
If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and
reopen it. If
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
___
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
The patch file is against distutils, should the title be changed to reflect
that?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
stage: - patch review
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Mark, I’d say no, since the component field is already set. Actually, if you
find reports that have distutils in the title but not as component, it would be
helpful to set the right component. Thanks.
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
I’m in favor of committing the patch. I don’t like that it has no tests, but in
this case I guess we have to rely on the documentation and just trust it will
do the Right Thing™.
Re: compatibility, the reason is that people want to use
Jason Kankiewicz jkankiew...@acm.org added the comment:
Seo, This ticket specifies Python-2.6 as the only version so using any
didn't seem to be a problem.
I was not aware of PEP 291 until you mentioned it and, in order to
maintain compatibility with Python-2.3, the generator expression would
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
min() is a substitute for all() and
max() is a substitute for any().
They are O(n) but do not have the early
out behavior of any() and all().
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Jason Kankiewicz jkankiew...@acm.org added the comment:
I've attached a patch, based on the original, that will fix distutils
for both GCC and ICC.
--
nosy: +jkankiewicz
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14250/distutils-rpath-gcc_and_icc.patch
Changes by Jason Kankiewicz jkankiew...@acm.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14250/distutils-rpath-gcc_and_icc.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
___
Jason Kankiewicz jkankiew...@acm.org added the comment:
I've updated my patch to resemble the patch from issue1032 and also
because profiling showed that using str.__contains__ is more efficient
than using str.find.
--
Added file:
Seo Sanghyeon sanx...@gmail.com added the comment:
any() built-in is new in 2.5. PEP 291 specifies 2.3 compatibility for
distutils. (tarek: Why?) The original patch used str.find because
backward-compatibility requirement used to be stricter.
--
___
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
FWIW, min() can usually be substituted for any().
--
nosy: +rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
Changes by Akira Kitada akit...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +tarek
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Christian Heimes:
--
components: +Build
type: - compile error
versions: +Python 2.6 -Python 2.5
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1254718
_
Sean Reifschneider added the comment:
NOTE: See also issue1032 which has a patch for this.
Can we come to a consensus on which one has the best patch?
--
assignee: - loewis
nosy: +jafo, loewis
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16 matches
Mail list logo
