Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
The broken links seem to be only in the time objects section, and only in the
body of attribute/method directives.
The attached patch fixes the issue by using :class:`~datetime.time` explicitly
where the links are broken.
Georg, is this
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
No, it's not, it's how Sphinx works. Use :class:`.time` to refer to the
datetime class.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13076
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:
New changeset 854e31d80151 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#13076: fix links to datetime.time.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/854e31d80151
New changeset 95689ed69097 by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2':
#13076: fix links to
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
This should be fixed now, thanks for the report.
FTR with Sphinx 1.0 all the links to :class:`time` and also :class:`datetime`
needed to be fixed because they were pointing to the modules, with 0.6 only the
:class:`time` in the body of
New submission from Geoffrey Bache gjb1...@users.sourceforge.net:
Reading through the datetime module documentation, various places that refer to
datetime.time objects are in fact links to the time module. They should
refer to the appropriate section on the same page.
--
messages:
Changes by Geoffrey Bache gjb1...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
assignee: - docs@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +docs@python
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13076
___
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
stage: - needs patch
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.4
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13076
___
