[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-11-09 Thread Eric Snow
Eric Snow added the comment: Given that issue14657 wrapped up, I'm closing this issue too. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14080

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-04-23 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Happened again on one of the Windows buildbots: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/x86%20XP-4%203.x/builds/6436/steps/test/logs/stdio == FAIL:

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-04-23 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Some entries in sys.path_importer_cache are named _frozen_importlib.FileFinder, and others are named importlib._bootstrap.FileFinder. Isn't that a bit worrying? Two copies of importlib are loaded in memory? (and functioning independently?)

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-04-23 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: Issue #14657 is tracking the discussion of _frozen_importlib/importlib._bootstrap. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14080

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: Then how do you explain the failure being nothing more than prepending . compared to an absolute file path? Anyway, the test passes under importlib with ``./python.exe -m importlib.test.regrtest test_imp``, so it requires some special setup to

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-27 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: I think there's another problem on Windows even after the fix: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/x86%20Windows7%203.x/builds/4463 == FAIL:

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-27 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: This is issue #14052 all over again, just with a different test. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14080 ___

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-27 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: This is issue #14052 all over again, just with a different test. I don't think so, because I've whacked the part of importlib that transformed '' into os.getcwd(). -- ___ Python tracker

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-26 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: So the test needs to be fixed to call importlib.invalidate_caches() after creating the module. That works. With issue14080.diff I can run the failing combination without problems: $ ./python -m test test_sqlite test_imp [1/2]

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-26 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: importlib.invalidate_caches() would become a permanent thing if the directory listdir cache approach stays and importlib gets bootstrapped. But it would be made more general to work for any and all loaders and not be specific to importlib (e.g.

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-26 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment: New changeset 1d7472b015f0 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #14080: fix sporadic test_imp failure. Patch by Stefan Krah. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1d7472b015f0 -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-26 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Thanks for diagnosing this :) -- assignee: brett.cannon - resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: I've trouble debugging this: Is the new version of importlib already being used? I'm stepping through the offending pep3147 import, which should correspond to this line in test_dot.py: m = __import__('pep3147') Until here

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Nadeem Vawda
Changes by Nadeem Vawda nadeem.va...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +nadeem.vawda ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14080 ___ ___

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Is this expected? Looks rather strange to me, it means we have importlib importers on sys.path_importer_cache. Still, the fact that path == '.' above (in _FileFinder as well as find_module_path) makes it difficult to understand the later

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: OK, I stepped in parallel through the non-failing and the failing versions. The first divergence is when _path_mtime is compared. The comparison in the good version returns 'False', the one in the bad version returns 'True': Good version

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: So I think the good version proceeds to refresh the _path_cache: _FileFinder(_relaxed_path_cache={'pep3147'}, packages=[('.py', type at remote 0xaaff60), ('.pyc', type at remote 0xab02e0)], _path_mtime=float at remote 0xa66120,

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: And indeed, with this patch ... diff --git a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py --- a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py +++ b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py @@ -777,6 +777,8 @@ mtime =

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 16:59 +, Stefan Krah a écrit : Bad version: $ ./python -m test test_dot [1/1] test_dot 1330188676.0 1330188676.0 This might be what triggers the issue, but it's not the cause. Even with a bad mtime, the

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: This might be what triggers the issue, but it's not the cause. Even with a bad mtime, the __file__ should still be the right one, so there must be something else. It definitely triggers the

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: What happens is that if self._fill_cache() is called, cache_module='pep3147' and cache={'pep3147'}. Then 'cache_module in cache' is true and the function returns: loader('pep3147', './pep3147/__init__.py') Otherwise, find_module()

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-25 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: What happens is that if self._fill_cache() is called, cache_module='pep3147' and cache={'pep3147'}. Then 'cache_module in cache' is true and the function returns: loader('pep3147', './pep3147/__init__.py') Otherwise, find_module()

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: I think the test is bogus. It would do better to either use str.endswith() or splitting off the various parts of __file__ to verify the filename is correct as is the directory. Otherwise it shouldn't matter if the directory is relative or

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Otherwise it shouldn't matter if the directory is relative or absolute. That's not really the issue here, both are relative. I am still baffled at that failure, I don't see why would be chosen over . (which is inserted at the beginning of

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: Well, if you execute test_imp w/ importlib (-m importlib.test.regrtest test_imp) it still passes. So there is something very odd going on that probably relies on some other test doing something weird. And this might be hard to diagnose until

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: OK, on FreeBSD the failure occurs reliably when test_sqlite and test_imp are chained, perhaps because of the import failure of sqlite3: [stefan@freebsd-amd64 ~/hg/cpython]$ ./python -m test -uall test_sqlite test_imp [1/2] test_sqlite

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: OK, on FreeBSD the failure occurs reliably when test_sqlite and test_imp are chained, perhaps because of the import failure of sqlite3: Mmh, funny, I can't trigger it here. Is there anything special in your sys.path? --

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: No, this is sys.path after sys.path.insert(0, os.curdir): ['.', '', '/usr/local/lib/python33.zip', '/usr/home/stefan/hg/cpython/Lib', '/usr/home/stefan/hg/cpython/Lib/plat-freebsd9',

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: I can confirm the failure when an import fails prior to running test_imp (i.e. trying importing some non-existent module like Stefan did at the top of test_imp). Luckily importlib doesn't fail in this case. =) --

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: I can confirm the failure when an import fails prior to running test_imp (i.e. trying importing some non-existent module like Stefan did at the top of test_imp). Luckily importlib doesn't fail in this case. =) I can't reproduce :( Can either

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment: I'd rather get importlib working fast enough that you are okay with bootstrapping it so we can delete the offending code. =) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: Here's a minimal test case for now. It only fails if called as -m test: $ ./python Lib/test/test_dot.py # OK $ ./python Lib/test/regrtest.py test_dot # OK [1/1] test_dot Warning -- sys.path was modified by test_dot $

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: Antoine, what is your gcc version? The test case I posted fails with Debian/gcc-4.3.2 and Ubuntu/gcc-4.4.3. The two affected buildbots have gcc-4.2.x. But the test case passes on Fedora/gcc-4.6. --

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Antoine, what is your gcc version? The test case I posted fails with Debian/gcc-4.3.2 and Ubuntu/gcc-4.4.3. The two affected buildbots have gcc-4.2.x. Mageia/gcc-4.5.2 here. It also passes with Debian/gcc-4.4.5. --

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-22 Thread Eric Snow
Changes by Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14080 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-21 Thread Antoine Pitrou
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/AMD64%20FreeBSD%208.2%203.x/builds/1845/steps/test/logs/stdio == FAIL: test_package___file__ (test.test_imp.PEP3147Tests)

[issue14080] Sporadic test_imp failure

2012-02-21 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Updated build URL (the buildbot changed name): http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/AMD64%20FreeBSD%209.0%203.x/builds/1845/steps/test/logs/stdio -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org