[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2013-05-06 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Would anyone mind committing this? It was approved by Raymond almost a year ago now, and is still accurate. The patch still applies cleanly to 3.3 and default, though with some fuzz. -- versions: -Python 3.2 ___

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2013-05-06 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset e2a805281d26 by R David Murray in branch '3.3': #14187: Add glossary entry for 'function annotations'. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e2a805281d26 New changeset 3e1c45f5c585 by R David Murray in branch 'default': Merge #14187: Add glossary entry

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2013-05-06 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Done. Thanks for the ping. And thanks for the suggestion and patch, Chris. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2013-01-04 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187 ___ ___

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-06-19 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-14 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Will do. Chris, I don’t think another entry for “annotation” is needed, given Raymond’s previous rejection of the paragraph talking about other languages. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-13 Thread Chris Rebert
Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com added the comment: Right, I can see how the 3rd paragraph has become tangential given the refined scope of the entry. What do people think about a separate entry: annotation Can refer to either a `function annotation` or some uses of `decorator`s.

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-13 Thread Chris Rebert
Changes by Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25568/function_annotation_v2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187 ___

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-13 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment: This looks fine. Éric, please apply the v2 patch when you get a chance. -- assignee: rhettinger - eric.araujo priority: normal - low ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment: I agree with Raymond that last paragraph should be removed; +1 for the remaining part -- nosy: +sandro.tosi ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-11 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Thanks, LGTM. -- title: add annotation entry to Glossary - add function annotation entry to Glossary ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187

[issue14187] add function annotation entry to Glossary

2012-05-11 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment: The third paragraph should be dropped. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14187 ___