Éric Araujo added the comment:
+1! This notation helps clearing up how int, str and other constructors work.
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14783
___
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
Here's a patch for the signature.
--
assignee: - ezio.melotti
keywords: +patch
stage: needs patch - commit review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27075/issue14783.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
.. function:: int(n=0)
int(s, base=10)
should do the trick.
+1 on using this instead of int([number | string[, base]])
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14783
Changes by Chris Rebert pyb...@rebertia.com:
--
nosy: +cvrebert
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14783
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
The 3.3 version has the virtue of being accurate and the vice of being
confusing. In a way, it has made the docs worse for the average user of common
cases.
Is there a way to stack the alternative signatures rather than mush the various
used into a
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: docs@python -
nosy: +ezio.melotti
stage: - needs patch
type: - enhancement
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14783
New submission from Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
int.__doc__ starts int(x[, base]) - integer. That is not exactly correct as
x is not required and base is only allowed if x is a string. The 3.3 manual
fixes both problems with int([number | string[, base]])
I actually think the rest of the
Changes by Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - docs@python
components: +Documentation
nosy: +docs@python, tshepang
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14783
