[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2013-03-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: This is now fixed, with 1.0.0k and 1.0.1d -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15052 ___

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth+python-trac...@gmail.com added the comment: In addition to the fixes from issue15102, the only way I could get the ssl project to build successfully was to add the Perl installation (C:\Perl\bin) to my PATH. -- ___ Python

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: Again: installing Perl should not be necessary. That it is currently necessary is a bug in the sources. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15052

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kl...@gmail.com added the comment: Should I then open another issue just to track that bug? Have you even tried using build_ssl.py *without* Perl? The changes required to get that to work seem fairly extensive. -- ___ Python

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth+python-trac...@gmail.com added the comment: OK, I have discovered my issue(s) building OpenSSL. When I first downloaded the openssl-1.0.1c external, the timestamps for the .asm files ended up being older than their corresponding .pl sources therefore triggering the

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth+python-trac...@gmail.com added the comment: I forgot to add that with the patch the comment wrt Perl is truly correct. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15052

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-18 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: Should I then open another issue just to track that bug? Have you even tried using build_ssl.py *without* Perl? The changes required to get that to work seem fairly extensive. The 3.3 tree works fine for me without Perl, I'm confident

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-15 Thread Jeremy Kloth
Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kl...@gmail.com added the comment: I would suggest trying to build OpenSSL (build_ssl.py) *without* Perl installed. On Windows (7,64-bit at least) a dialog box pops up many times asking which program to use to run XXX.pl. This is using the externals from svn.python.org.

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-13 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: The comment is correct. The sources are not. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15052 ___

[issue15052] Outdated comments in build_ssl.py

2012-06-12 Thread Jeremy Kloth
New submission from Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth+python-trac...@gmail.com: The comment regarding a Perl installation not being required is no longer true with regards to OpenSSL 1.0+ (at least 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c). A Perl script(s) is used to generate source files within the generated Makefiles.