[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2014-05-25 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset dc353953ce8b by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default': Issue 15246: Improve test coverage for collections.abc.Set. (Contributed by James King). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/dc353953ce8b -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2014-05-25 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Thanks for the patch. Nice work. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15246

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2012-07-07 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - rhettinger ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15246 ___ ___

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2012-07-05 Thread James King
James King ja...@agentultra.com added the comment: How about a working test instead? Let me know if it looks right. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26267/set_abc_coverage.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2012-07-04 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +rhettinger, stutzbach stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15246 ___

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2012-07-04 Thread Mark Dickinson
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment: Can you attach the failing tests for __and__? -- nosy: +mark.dickinson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15246 ___

[issue15246] Line coverage for collectionts.abc.Set

2012-07-03 Thread James King
New submission from James King ja...@agentultra.com: I'm working on increasing the line-coverage of the tests for the Set ABC in the collections.abc module. I encountered something a little funky IMO that I'm not sure is an issue or bug... but the __and__ method passes a generator object to