[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2013-01-10 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: For the record, this is a regression introduced by the fix for issue 9750. I plan to commit the fix shortly, thanks for the report and patch. -- nosy: +r.david.murray stage: - commit review type: crash - behavior versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3,

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2013-01-10 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 2cdb599172ab by R David Murray in branch '3.2': #15545: fix sqlite3.iterdump regression on unsortable row_factory objects. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2cdb599172ab New changeset 6a85894c428f by R David Murray in branch '3.3': merge #15545: fix

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2013-01-10 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Peter, I see you've made contributions before, but you don't show as having a contributor agreement on file according to the tracker. Have you sent one in? If not, would you, please? Thanks again for the fix. -- components: +Library (Lib) -None

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-09-21 Thread Pierre Le Marre
Pierre Le Marre added the comment: Thanks for the patch. In which version will be your patch integrated? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15545 ___

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-08-06 Thread Pierre Le Marre
Pierre Le Marre added the comment: By the way, this issue does not appear with Python 3.2.2. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15545 ___

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-08-06 Thread Peter Otten
Peter Otten added the comment: Here's a minimal fix that modifies the sql in sqlite3.dump._iterdump() to sort the tables by name. It is then no longer necessary to sort the resultset in Python for the unit tests to pass. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +peter.otten Added file:

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-08-03 Thread Pierre Le Marre
Changes by Pierre Le Marre lema...@eifer.org: -- components: None nosy: plemarre priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row type: crash versions: Python 3.2 ___

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-08-03 Thread Martin v . Löwis
New submission from Martin v. Löwis: Can you please elaborate? Structure your report as follows: 1. this is what I did 2. this is what happened 3. this is what should have happened instead. -- nosy: +loewis ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15545] sqlite3.Connection.iterdump() does not work with row_factory = sqlite3.Row

2012-08-03 Thread Pierre Le Marre
Pierre Le Marre added the comment: I use Python 3.2.3 on GNU/Linux 64bits (openSUSE 12.2). I have created an in-memory connection with the following code: conn = sqlite3.connect(:memory:, detect_types=sqlite3.PARSE_DECLTYPES, check_same_thread=False) conn.row_factory = sqlite3.Row Then I have