Eric Snow added the comment:
yeah, I keep thinking we need a better API for managing tracebacks. One of
these days...
--
nosy: +eric.snow
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15891
New submission from Julian Berman:
Can `__unittest = True`, which is used to hide stack frames from tracebacks
inside the testing framework, be documented as being public, or, if that's not
acceptable, be replaced by something that is? `_exc_info_to_string` is a hairy
function to need to
R. David Murray added the comment:
This is a duplicate of issue 1705520. Since Michael obviously hasn't gotten to
it yet, a proposed patch might move things along.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
stage: - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
superseder: - API for excluding methods from
Michael Foord added the comment:
Whatever we do must be backwards compatible. The question is, is a better api
that doesn't use stack frames (which is a hack in my opinion) even possible?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
