[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: I think this patch must be applied too to 2.7 and 3.2. Felipe, you are using %R modifier, but that modifier doesn't exist in Solaris, for instance. This seems to be a Linux specific option, I don't know what it does. Also, you should be sure not to overflow

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Jesus, please read the PyErr_Format() documentation. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897 ___

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: Should I send patches for 3.2 and 2.7? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897 ___ ___

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Antoine, I was reading the documentation of Python 2.7. It doesn't support %R. Felipe, Python 2.7 has direct access to the path. You can print it directly, in this case. I will take care of this. -- assignee: - jcea

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 39e608d462b6 by Jesus Cea in branch '2.7': Closes #15897: zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek() http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/39e608d462b6 New changeset 4da48083aaab by Jesus Cea in branch '3.2': Closes #15897: zipimport.c doesn't

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: You broke the build of 3.2: ./Modules/zipimport.c: In function 'read_directory': ./Modules/zipimport.c:747:65: error: 'archive' undeclared (first use in this function) ./Modules/zipimport.c:747:65: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-02 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 0f4d4f4db724 by Jesus Cea in branch '3.2': Closes #15897: zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek(). Typo http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0f4d4f4db724 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-10-01 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: Hello! Just sent the Contributor Agreement Form. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897 ___ ___

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-30 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Felipe, could you please submit a Contributor Agreement Form? http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ Your patch looks good to me, although I would move almost all fclose(fp); PyErr_Format(ZipImportError, can't read Zip file: %R, archive); return NULL; To a

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-15 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: I've updated the patch changing fseek_error goto block error return from PyErr_SetFromErrno to PyErr_Format(ZipImportError, can't read Zip file: %R, archive); (returning NULL after). -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27194/issue15897_v1.patch

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-15 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: You can further compress the changes when you get rid of `rc` and check the return value inline, for example: if (fseek(...) == -1) { errorhandler; } -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-15 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: v4 - inline fseek return code check - as Christian suggested -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27195/issue15897_v4.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-14 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: Hello! This is one of my first patches. Tests still OK! Let me know what you think! Thanks! -- keywords: +patch nosy: +felipecruz Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27191/issue15897_v1.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-14 Thread Felipe Cruz
Felipe Cruz added the comment: Patch updated - fseek errors messges will be can't read Zip file' and not can't Open Zip file -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27192/issue15897_v1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-14 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: I suggested to Felipe on IRC to use read instead of seek because I don't think it's worth making a distinction between the two. Moreover ISTM that in most of the cases, if the fseek fails, the error is detected in a following fread, so the message currently

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-09 Thread Christian Heimes
New submission from Christian Heimes: The code im zipimport.c doesn't check the return value of fseek() in at least four places. The missing checks may hide issues with the file or file system. Solution: Check for -1 and return with an appropriate call to PyErr_SetFromErrno() --

[issue15897] zipimport.c doesn't check return value of fseek()

2012-09-09 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es: -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15897 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list