Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda added the comment:
Hi, so I'm not sure I understand this correctly. AFAICS there are two patches
in issue 14443 that are, to certain degree, independent. As for the patch that
overrides __os_install_post [1], that is no longer needed in RHEL 7, since the
line
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Thanks Slavek. That means this bug doesn't affect RHEL 7 or CentOS 7, and if it
affects the Python 3 software collections on RHEL/CentOS 6, we can potentially
deal with it on the collection side of things.
Accordingly, closing this as a problem for downstream
Mark Lawrence added the comment:
Who is best placed to produce a patch for this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16237
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Actually, with RHEL and CentOS 7 out the door, I believe we could potentially
just rip the whole mess out of the upstream project.
Slavek, this is about a hack Dave and I put into bdist_rpm to get Python 3
packages building correctly on RHEL 6. I believe the
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16237
___
___
Python-bugs-list
New submission from Nick Coghlan:
In resolving 14443 we effectively embedded the vendor macros in the SPEC file
generated by bdist_rpm on older versions of RHEL (and derivatives).
While I think that's a necessary evil (in order to create Python 3 RPMs that
actually work properly at all on