Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Good catch!
Committed revision 59659.
I wonder how many other places have the same problem...
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes by Andre Roberge:
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1707
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Andre Roberge added the comment:
I did a quick search on the *.py files in the distribution. I only
found two questionable places.
1. site.py has raw_input (python 2.5, line 311) replaced by the more
complicated 3 lines (python 3.0a2, lines 313-315) rather than the
simpler one-liner
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
site.py is already fixed in svn; it actually did cause problems, see
issue #1667.
I fixed pydoc.py.
Committed revision 59660.
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1707
__
New submission from Andre Roberge:
There appears to be a bug in code.py in Python 3.0a2/a1.
I believe that the body of
InteractiveConsole().raw_input()
should be changed from
sys.stdout.write(prompt)
sys.stdout.flush()
return sys.stdin.readline()
to
return
