Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Can this be closed as a duplicate as Issue1744456 has a patch?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1713877
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Yes, that makes sense (the two issues come from the SourceForge era, where bugs
and patches had different trackers).
--
dependencies: -Patch for feat. 1713877 Expose callbackAPI in readline module
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: -
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +Patch for feat. 713877 Expose callbackAPI in readline module
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1713877
Changes by Christian Heimes:
--
versions: +Python 2.6
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1713877
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Christian Heimes added the comment:
A patch is always welcome
--
nosy: +tiran
_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1713877
_
___
Python-bugs-list
strank added the comment:
I am pretty sure I posted a patch in the sf patch tracker... oh yes,
here it is: http://bugs.python.org/issue1744456
I think it still needs some work if you want to make it impossible for
users of the API to wreck the interactive prompt. If this possibility is
