[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-03-13 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Committed in revision 61374 (w/ changes so that the key stuff is not order-dependent). Thanks, Giampaolo! -- resolution: - accepted status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-02-17 Thread Brett Cannon
Changes by Brett Cannon: -- assignee: - brett.cannon __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1960 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-02-08 Thread Christian Heimes
Changes by Christian Heimes: -- keywords: +patch priority: - normal __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1960 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-02-06 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: The diff file in attachment was generated by using TortoiseSVN and it seems to be different than using svn diff. The new diff file is in attachment. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9363/test_gdbm.diff __ Tracker [EMAIL

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-29 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Updated version in attachment. Changes: - Added if self.g is not None: self.g.close() clause in tearDown. - Used test.test_support.unlink(filename) instead of the try/except statement. - Added tests for the flag clause in the open() statement by trying all

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-29 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola': Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9323/test_gdbm.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1960 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola': In attachment. All existent tests are unchanged. -- components: Tests files: test_gdbm.diff messages: 61806 nosy: giampaolo.rodola severity: normal status: open title: test_gdbm.py converted to unittest type: rfe versions: Python 2.6 Added file:

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola': Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9316/test_gdbm.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1960 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: Have a look at http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=290 where a GHOP student did a conversion as well. Any chance to come up with a possible merged version that takes the best from your work, Giampaolo and the student's

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Have a look at http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=290 where a GHOP student did a conversion as well. Interesting, didn't know about that. In future I'll check that site before start working on a new patch

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: On Jan 28, 2008 5:03 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Have a look at http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=290 where a GHOP student did a conversion as well.

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Giampaolo Rodola'
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Well, if you have an opinion, feel free to leave a comment in this issue about it. I will most likely be the one who does the checkin and I will read this issue before I commit. * One of the things I dislike is the fact that the student used self.g =

[issue1960] test_gdbm.py converted to unittest

2008-01-28 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: On Jan 28, 2008 6:20 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: Well, if you have an opinion, feel free to leave a comment in this issue about it. I will most likely be the one who does the checkin and I will read