[issue20765] Pathlib docs fail to mention with_name, with_suffix

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Interesting. According to the Mercurial logs, they were never actually documented... -- assignee: docs@python - pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20765

[issue20765] Pathlib docs fail to mention with_name, with_suffix

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 879861161b84 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #20765: Add missing documentation for PurePath.with_name() and PurePath.with_suffix(). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/879861161b84 -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue20765] Pathlib docs fail to mention with_name, with_suffix

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I've now added the missing doc entries. Thanks for reporting! -- resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed type: - behavior versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker

[issue20765] Pathlib docs fail to mention with_name, with_suffix

New submission from Antony Lee: I actually thought that Path.with_{name,suffix} had been removed before 3.4 when I didn't find them in the official docs... -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 212160 nosy: Antony.Lee, docs@python priority: normal severity:

[issue20765] Pathlib docs fail to mention with_name, with_suffix

Changes by Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20765 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list