Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 4b6b03c1f4ff by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4':
Closes #22475: asyncio doc, fix Task.get_stack() doc
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4b6b03c1f4ff
--
nosy: +python-dev
resolution: - fixed
stage: - resolved
status: open - closed
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I fixed the most obvious issue in the documentation. I don't know the function
enough to propose a better documentation, sorry.
Don't hesitate to write a patch on the documentation if you have a better
explanation of how get_stack() behaves.
It is correct
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22475
___
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
components: +asyncio
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22475
___
___
New submission from R. David Murray:
The get_stack method docs say:
If the coroutine is active, returns the stack where it was suspended.
I presume this means something more like if the coroutine is not done...,
since in English you can't be both active *and* suspended. Or does it mean
last
