STINNER Victor added the comment:
> This requires quite a bit of work though for a relatively minor improvement
> so do you think it's worth the effort ?
If you factorize code of unit tests, I expect better tests and more tests, so
yes, it's valuable.
But since this issue is old (no activity
Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +vadmium
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22495
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Martin Panter added the comment:
Yeah it would be good to put related tests in the one place.
I was trying to find a good place to test how the comparison operators invoke
the __eq__(), __gt__() etc methods, and the existing tests seem to be spread
over test_compare.py and test_binop.py.
New submission from Wolfgang Maier:
test_binop.py says that it tests binary operators on subtypes of built-in
types, but in fact largely focuses on testing its own class Rat, which simply
inherits from object and is, essentially, just a simple implementation of
fractions.Fraction.
Instead of
