Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed code and doc patches as r63094. Thanks!
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2250
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I attached a patch for the docs.
It now states that the rlcompleter.Completer will catch and silence all
exceptions raised by evaluating the expression passed to complete()
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10054/rlcompleter.rst.diff
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
In the last patch I used the wrong ticks. I hope it's fine like this.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10055/rlcompleter.rst.diff
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2250
Changes by Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10054/rlcompleter.rst.diff
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2250
__
___
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I confirmed that the rlcompleter can raise a SyntaxError on bad input.
Upon further investigation I found that a ReferenceError could also be
raised. I didn't check on other Exceptions.
I attached a new version of the patch where I catch all
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I was thinking that the code in question could maybe also raise other
exceptions. too bad I´m on vacation and can´t try this out myself.
I believe the regular expression also matches something like
import rlcompleter
Lorenz Quack [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have no idea what or who NAS is but comments are always welcome :)
concerning the documentation:
I´ve never done it before but there is a first time for everything,
right? I´m currently on vacation so I won´t look into it for at least
another
Neil Schemenauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:49:32PM +, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
Is a straightforward patch, but I'd like NAS to comment on the change in
behavior. Probably would also need a documentation change, are you up
for doing that Lorenz?
I
Sean Reifschneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is a straightforward patch, but I'd like NAS to comment on the change in
behavior. Probably would also need a documentation change, are you up
for doing that Lorenz?
--
assignee: - nascheme
keywords: +easy
nosy: +jafo, nascheme
