[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Python 2.7 is no longer supported. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

Mariatta Wijaya added the comment: Documentation fixes to 2.7 is still accepted. Please create a PR on GitHub. -- nosy: +Mariatta ___ Python tracker ___

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

ndevenish added the comment: I've just spent some time running around because of this. Are documentation contributions still being accepted for python 2.7 at all? Some of the buffer documentation seems to be confusing as to whether you use new or old API. -- nosy: +ndevenish

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

Changes by Giacomo Alzetta giacomo.alze...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python type: - enhancement versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23850

[issue23850] Missing documentation for Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER

New submission from Giacomo Alzetta: Python2.7 documentation is missing critical information regarding the backporting of the new-buffer protocol. There is no mention whatsoever of the Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_NEWBUFFER flag which is required to implement it. The only way to discover it is by reading