[issue24921] Operator precedence table in 5.15 should be highest to lowest precedence

Change by Ama Aje My Fren : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +amaajemyfren nosy_count: 5.0 -> 6.0 pull_requests: +19812 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20572 ___ Python tracker

[issue24921] Operator precedence table in 5.15 should be highest to lowest precedence

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.6, Python 3.7, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24921] Operator precedence table in 5.15 should be highest to lowest precedence

Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24921 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue24921] Operator precedence table in 5.15 should be highest to lowest precedence

New submission from Joseph Schachner: We should not make people who need to read Python documentation do an extra transformation in their heads to correctly understand that in section 5.15 higher precedence is at the bottom of the table and lower precedence is at the top. Because the

[issue24921] Operator precedence table in 5.15 should be highest to lowest precedence

Stefan Krah added the comment: Yacc uses low to high. -- nosy: +skrah ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24921 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list