[issue25739] Add PAYLOAD_TOO_LARGE / URI_TOO_LONG (new name in RFC 7231)

2020-09-17 Thread Zackery Spytz
Change by Zackery Spytz : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +ZackerySpytz nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +21348 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22295 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25739] Add PAYLOAD_TOO_LARGE / URI_TOO_LONG (new name in RFC 7231)

2015-11-26 Thread Martin Panter
Martin Panter added the comment: In general, I’m not sure it is worth adding aliases for various names used in different RFCs. But you could argue that this is appropriate because the old names are unnecessarily long. Another example would be HTTPStatus.REQUESTED_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE vs “Rang

[issue25739] Add PAYLOAD_TOO_LARGE / URI_TOO_LONG (new name in RFC 7231)

2015-11-26 Thread SpaceOne
SpaceOne added the comment: Also URI_TOO_LONG has been changed. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.11 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.5.12 -- title: Add PAYLOAD_TOO_LARGE (new name in RFC 7231) -> Add PAYLOAD_TOO_LARGE / URI_TOO_LONG (new name in RFC 7231) _