[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2014-06-22 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Looks as if the status was inadvertently set to languishing. Stage needs setting to patch review. The patch is effectively all new C code but there are no doc changes or tests. -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2010-05-07 Thread Jean-Paul Calderone
Changes by Jean-Paul Calderone exar...@twistedmatrix.com: -- keywords: +needs review status: open - languishing versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2574

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-10-06 Thread T.Morin
T.Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I've applied the patch to the release26-maint branch, and I was able to properly compile, run and do some basic testing of the result. Find attached a patch applying cleanly to SVN release26-maint branch. -- versions: +Python 2.6 -Python 2.5

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-09-22 Thread T.Morin
T.Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Exercising the API fully requires an SSM capable multicast LAN. ... and it also requires a host IP stack implementing the API, which is not yet (AFAIK) the case for Mac OS X, even very recent releases. I think you will need a Windows or Linux box

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-09-17 Thread Bill Janssen
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I tried applying this patch to a clean SVN checkout of the 2.6 trunk on an OS X Leopard machine and it works (except for the part which patches configure.in). I then built the source tree and ran the test_socket test, which also worked fine. I

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-09-17 Thread Bill Janssen
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM, bms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exercising the API fully requires an SSM capable multicast LAN. Let's hope the PARC network is still up-to-date. It was when we were developing multicast here some 15-20 years

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-09-16 Thread T.Morin
Changes by T.Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +tmorin ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2574 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-04-08 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Ok, we'll see what we can do. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2574 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-04-07 Thread bms
New submission from bms [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Here is a patch to add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to low-level Python socket module as of 2.5.1. I have not tested the setsourcefilter()/getsourcefilter() socket member functions other than compiling the patch on a Gentoo Linux 2008.0 box

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-04-07 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you submit a patch against the trunk? There aren't going to be any new features in 2.5. -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2574

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-04-07 Thread bms
bms [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Benjamin Peterson wrote: Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you submit a patch against the trunk? There aren't going to be any new features in 2.5. Would a patch against 2.6a2 be OK? I have had a lot of problems building

[issue2574] Add RFC 3768 SSM Multicast support to socket

2008-04-07 Thread bms
bms [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Bruce M Simpson wrote: Benjamin Peterson wrote: Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Can you submit a patch against the trunk? There aren't going to be any new features in 2.5. Would a patch against 2.6a2 be OK? I have had a