[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-04 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: > It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either? Excuse me for not having all issues in my head. (And that #26010 states that it's a followup to #26010 doesn't help.) In the future, please accept that the core developers are who

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-04 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: > For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered > before so this remains closed. Are you quite all right? Continuing behavior of that sort will get your tracker account disabled. -- nosy: +georg.brandl status: closed -> open

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-04 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either? -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-04 Thread Yury Selivanov
Changes by Yury Selivanov : -- superseder: -> document CO_* constants ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Mark, please don't close the issue. You raised a valid point, it got overlooked, but like I said I think Yuri will be interested in looking at it. This is a volunteer operation. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered before so this remains closed. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: I think Yuri might be interested. -- assignee: docs@python -> yselivanov nosy: +r.david.murray, yselivanov stage: needs patch -> status: closed -> open type: enhancement -> ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: I'll leave it closed, but I don't think that is best for the community. -- assignee: yselivanov -> ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread Berker Peksag
Changes by Berker Peksag : -- stage: -> needs patch status: closed -> open type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: I am the OP, this stays closed. If you couldn't be bothered to reply before please raise a new issue. -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Clearly nobody is interested so closing. -- status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2016-01-02 Thread Mark Lawrence
Changes by Mark Lawrence : -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2015-12-06 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: None of these constants are documented either:- inspect.CO_COROUTINE inspect.CO_GENERATOR inspect.CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE inspect.CO_NESTED inspect.CO_NEWLOCALS inspect.CO_NOFREE inspect.CO_OPTIMIZED inspect.CO_VARARGS inspect.CO_VARKEYWORDS --

[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date

2015-12-05 Thread Mark Lawrence
New submission from Mark Lawrence: It states "bitmap: 1=optimized | 2=newlocals | 4=*arg | 8=**arg" which is identical to the 2.7 docs. Hence it bears no resemblance to the latest code.h, which for example has #define CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE 0x0100. -- assignee: docs@python