[issue26042] Consider dropping magic number for more detailed .pyc file name

2016-01-07 Thread Brett Cannon
New submission from Brett Cannon: The reason the magic number exists in .pyc files is because back in Python 2 we only had a single .pyc file per module, which meant if you suddenly switched versions of Python you needed a way to know that the .pyc file was wrong for the running version of

[issue26042] Consider dropping magic number for more detailed .pyc file name

2016-01-07 Thread Eric Snow
Eric Snow added the comment: That's an interesting thought. My intuition is that it wouldn't be worth doing. It would certainly trade one development overhead for another, so it's a bit of a wash there, I think. Are there other spots in the stdlib that rely on the magic number? Is it used

[issue26042] Consider dropping magic number for more detailed .pyc file name

2016-01-07 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: What about zipimport? It doesn't use __pycache__ directories, but just try to read *.pyc file, then *.py file. The launcher on Windows also check magic number (it contains a mapping from magic numbers to Python versions). -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka

[issue26042] Consider dropping magic number for more detailed .pyc file name

2016-01-07 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: I figured it was a wash. Closing as "won't fix". As for zipimport, it's busted thanks to the fact that it doesn't work with __pycache__ directories. Yet another reason it needs to be rewritten. -- resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed