[issue2611] Extend buildbot web interface to allow for forced tests to be run on a slave in verbose mode.

2010-01-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment: I'm closing this as won't fix. If there is a need to run specific tests in specific ways, it is best to check in code that does it as desired. If it is then unacceptable to run that change on all slaves, a branch can be created, and

[issue2611] Extend buildbot web interface to allow for forced tests to be run on a slave in verbose mode.

2010-01-22 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- priority: - normal stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2611 ___

[issue2611] Extend buildbot web interface to allow for forced tests to be run on a slave in verbose mode.

2008-04-14 Thread Neal Norwitz
Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think this will be fairly difficult to set up. If the clean buildstep had been executed, you would have to rerun configure and compile before you can run any tests. We could re-order and do clean first. That would leave all the build

[issue2611] Extend buildbot web interface to allow for forced tests to be run on a slave in verbose mode.

2008-04-14 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: We could re-order and do clean first. That would leave all the build artifacts in tact after a build which would be nice for some debugging. With the current setup, that wouldn't quite work. We can't run it before configure, because we

[issue2611] Extend buildbot web interface to allow for forced tests to be run on a slave in verbose mode.

2008-04-10 Thread Trent Nelson
New submission from Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It'd be nice if there was a facility to force a particular test to be re-run in verbose mode with the most recent build via the buildbot web interface. It would allow us to get a bit more information about what's going on when the buildbots