Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Just another rather marginal findings; differences between regex and re:
regex.findall(r[\B], aBc)
['B']
re.findall(r[\B], aBc)
[]
(Python 2.7 ... on win32; regex - issue2636-20100912.zip)
I believe, regex is more correct here, as
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100913.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've removed the ZEROWIDTH flag and added the NEW flag, which turns on the new
behaviour such as splitting on zero-width matches and positional flags. If the
NEW flag
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100912.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More speedups. I've been comparing the speed against Perl wherever possible. In
some cases Perl is lightning fast, probably because regex is built into the
language and
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100824.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More speedups. Getting towards Perl speed now, depending on the regex. :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18621/issue2636-20100824.zip
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
Changes by A.M. Kuchling li...@amk.ca:
--
nosy: -akuchling
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100816.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Unfortunately I came across a bug in the handing of sets. More unit tests added.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18541/issue2636-20100816.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100814.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added default Unicode word boundaries and renamed the Pattern and Match
classes.
Over to you, Alex. :-)
--
Added file:
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 14 August 2010 21:24, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Over to you, Alex. :-)
Et voilà, an exciting Saturday evening
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/0.1.20100814
Matthew, I'm currently keeping regex in a private bzr
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Wishlist item: could you give the regex and match classes nicer names, so that
they can be referenced as `regex.Pattern` (or `regex.Regex`) and `regex.Match`?
--
___
Python tracker
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Does 'regex' implement default word boundaries (see #7255)?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
No.
Wouldn't that break compatibility with 're'?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
Jeffrey C. Jacobs timeho...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
What about a regex flag? Like regex.W or (?w)?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
That's a possibility.
I must admit that I don't entirely understand it enough to implement it (the OP
said I don't believe that the algorithm for this is a
whole lot more complicated), and I don't have a need for it myself, but if
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 25 July 2010 03:46, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
issue2636-20100725.zip is a new version of the regex module.
This is now packaged and uploaded to PyPI
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/0.1.20100725
--
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100725.zip is a new version of the regex module.
More tweaks for speed.
re regex
bm_regex_compile.py 87.05secs 278.00secs
bm_regex_effbot.py 14.00secs6.58secs
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
This has already been reported in issue #3511.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100719.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Just a few more tweaks for speed.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18054/issue2636-20100719.zip
___
Python tracker
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the update;
Just a small observation regarding some character ranges and ignorecase,
probably irrelevant, but a difference to the current re anyway:
zero2z =
Jonathan Halcrow jonathan.halc...@gmail.com added the comment:
The most recent version on pypi (20100709) seems to be missing _regex_core from
py_modules in setup.py. Currently import regex fails, unable to locate
_regex_core.
--
nosy: +jhalcrow
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 13 July 2010 22:34, Jonathan Halcrow rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
The most recent version on pypi (20100709) seems to be missing _regex_core
from py_modules in setup.py.
Sorry, my fault. I've uploaded a corrected version
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100709.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've moved most of the regex module's Python code into a private module.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17912/issue2636-20100709.zip
Mark Summerfield m...@qtrac.eu added the comment:
On the PyPI page:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/0.1.20100706.1
in the Subscripting for groups bullet it gives this pattern:
r(?before.*?)(?num\\d+)(?after.*)
Shouldn't this be:
r(?Pbefore.*?)(?Pnum\\d+)(?Pafter.*)
Or has a new syntax been
Mark Summerfield m...@qtrac.eu added the comment:
If you do:
import regex as re
dir(re)
you get over 160 items, many of which begin with an underscore and so are
private. Couldn't __dir__ be reimplemented to eliminate them. (I know that the
current re module's dir() also returns private
Mark Summerfield m...@qtrac.eu added the comment:
I was wrong about r(?name.*). It is valid in the new engine. And the PyPI
docs do say so immediately _following_ the example.
I've tried all the examples in Programming in Python 3 second edition using
import regex as re and they all worked.
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Mark, __dir__ as a special method only works when defined on types, so you'd
have to use a module subclass for the regex module :)
As I already suggested, it is probably best to move most of the private stuff
into a separate module, and only
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Matthew, I'd like to see at least some of these features in 3.2, but ISTM that
after more than 2 years this issue is not going anywhere.
Is the module still under active development? Is it ready? Is it waiting for
reviews and to be added
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
I've packaged Matthew's latest revision and uploaded it to PyPI. This
version will build for Python 2 and Python 3, parallel installs will
coexist on the same machine.
--
___
Python tracker
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I started with trying to modify the existing re module, but I wanted to make
too many changes, so in the end I decided to make a clean break and start on a
new implementation which was compatible with the existing re module and
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
So, if it's pretty much ready, do you think it could be included already in 3.2?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Before anything else is done with it, it should probably be announced in some
way. I'm not sure if anyone has opened any of these zip files, reviewed
anything, ran anything, or if anyone even knows this whole thing has been going
on.
--
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes, as I said in the previous message it should probably be announced on
python-dev and see what the others think. I don't know how much the module has
been used in the wild, but since there has been a PyPI package available for a
few
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The file at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
was downloaded 75 times, if that's any help. (Now reset to 0 because of the bug
fix.)
If it's included in 3.2 then there's the question of whether it should replace
the re module
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
If it's backward-compatible with the 're' module, all the tests of the test
suite pass and it just improves it and add features I don't see why not.
(That's just my personal opinion though, other people might (and probably will)
Jeffrey C. Jacobs timeho...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
My only addition opinion is that re is very much used in deployed python
applications and was written not just for correctness but also speed. As such,
regex should be benchmarked fairly to show that it is commensurately
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the prompt fix!
It would indeed be nice to see this enhanced re module in the standard library
e.g. in 3.2, but I also really appreciate, that also multiple 2.x versions are
supported (as my current main usage of this
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
FWIW, I'd love seeing the updated regex module in 3.2. Please do bring it up
on python-dev.
Looking at the latest module on PyPI, I noted that the regex.py file is very
long (~3500 lines), even though it is quite compressed (e.g. no blank
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 6 July 2010 18:03, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
The file at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/ was downloaded 75 times, if
that's any help. (Now reset to 0 because of the bug fix.)
Each release was downloaded between 50
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
As a crude guide of the speed difference, here's Python 2.6:
re regex
bm_regex_compile.py 86.53secs 260.19secs
bm_regex_effbot.py 13.70secs8.94secs
bm_regex_v8.py 15.66secs
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just noticed a somehow strange behaviour in matching character sets or
alternate matches which contain some more advanced unicode characters, if
they are in the search pattern with some simpler ones. The former seem to be
ignored
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100706.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added your examples to the unit tests. The module now passes.
Keep up the good work! :-)
--
Added file:
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 13 April 2010 03:21, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
issue2636-20100413.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Matthew, When I run test_regex.py 6 tests are failing, with Python
2.6.5 on Ubuntu Lucid and my setup.py.
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Yes, it passed all the tests, although I've since found a minor bug that isn't
covered/caught by them, so I'll need to add a few more tests.
Anyway, do:
regex.match(ur\p{Ll}, ua)
regex.match(ur'(?u)\w', u'\xe0')
really
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 13 April 2010 18:10, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Anyway, do:
  regex.match(ur\p{Ll}, ua)
  regex.match(ur'(?u)\w', u'\xe0')
really return None? Your results suggest that they won't.
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063,
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100414.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I think I might have identified the cause of the problem, although I still
haven't been able to reproduce it, so I can't be certain.
--
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
Oops, forgot the file! :-)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16916/issue2636-20100414.zip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 14 April 2010 00:33, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
I think I might have identified the cause of the problem, although I still
haven't been able to reproduce it, so I can't be certain.
Performed 76
Passed
Looks like you
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100413.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It includes additional speed-ups.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16905/issue2636-20100413.zip
___
Python tracker
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100331.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It includes speed-ups and a minor bugfix.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16709/issue2636-20100331.zip
___
Python
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100323.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It now includes a test script. Most of the tests come from the existing test
scripts.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16626/issue2636-20100323.zip
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
I've adapted the Python 2.6.5 test_re.py as follows,
from test.test_support import verbose, run_unittest
-import re
-from re import Scanner
+import regex as re
+from regex import Scanner
and run it against regex-2010305. Three tests failed,
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Does regex.py have its own test suite (which also includes tests for all the
problems reported in the last few messages)?
If so, the new tests could be merged in re's test_re. This will simplify the
testing of regex.py and will improve the
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I am not sure about the testsuite for this regex module, but it seems to me,
that many of the problems reported here probably don't apply for the current
builtin re, as they are connected with the new features of regex.
After the
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just noticed a cornercase with the newly introduced grapheme matcher \X, if
this is used in the character set:
regex.findall(\X, abc)
['a', 'b', 'c']
regex.findall([\X], abc)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File input, line 1,
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
\X shouldn't be allowed in a character class because it's equivalent to
\P{M}\p{M}*. It's a bug, now fixed in issue2636-20100304.zip.
I'm not convinced about the set intersection and difference stuff. Isn't that
overdoing it a
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Actually I had that impression too, but I was mainly surprised with these
requirements being on the lowest level of the unicode support. Anyway, maybe
the relevance of these guidelines for the real libraries is is lower, than I
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 26 February 2010 03:20, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16375/issue2636-20100226.zip
This is now uploaded to PyPI http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/0.1.20100226
--
Alex Willmer
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100226.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It now supports the branch reset (?|...|...), enabling the different branches
of an alternation to reuse group numbers.
--
Added file:
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100224.zip is a new version of the regex module.
It includes support for matching based on Unicode scripts as well as on Unicode
blocks and properties.
--
Added file:
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks, its indeed a very nice addition to the library...
Just a marginal remark; it seems, that in script-names also some non BMP
characters are covered, however, in the unicode ranges thee only BMP.
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Is the issue2636-20100222.zip archive supposed to be complete? I can't find not
only the rst or html features, but more importantly the py and pyd files for
the particular versions.
Anyway, I just skimmed through the
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I don't know what happened there. I didn't notice that the zip file was way too
small. Here's a replacement (still called issue2636-20100222.zip).
Unicode script properties are already included, at least those whose
definitions at
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
OK, you've convinced me, \X is supported. :-)
issue2636-20100223.zip is a new version of the regex module.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16331/issue2636-20100223.zip
___
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 22 Feb 2010, at 21:24, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org
wrote:
issue2636-20100222.zip is a new version of the regex module.
This new version adds reverse searching.
The 'features' now come in ReStructuredText (.rst) and HTML
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Wow, that's what can be called rapid development :-), thanks very much!
I did'n noticed before, that \G had been implemented already.
\X works fine for me, it also maintains the input string indices correctly.
We can use unicode
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
On 17 February 2010 19:35, Matthew Barnett rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
The main text at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex appears to have lost its
backslashes, for example:
  The Unicode escapes u and U are supported.
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for fixing the argument positions;
unfortunately, it seems, there might be some other problem, that makes my code
work differently than the builtin re;
it seems, in the character classes the ignorcase flag is ignored somehow:
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100219.zip is a new version of the regex module.
The regex module should give the same results as the re module for backwards
compatibility.
The ignorecase bug is now fixed.
This new version releases the GIL when
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
I've packaged this latest revision and uploaded to PyPI
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
The main text at http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex appears to have lost its
backslashes, for example:
The Unicode escapes u and U are supported.
instead of:
The Unicode escapes \u and \U are
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just tested the fix for unicode tracebacks and found some possibly weird
results (not sure how/whether it should be fixed, as these inputs are indeed
rather artificial...).
(win XPp SP3 Czech, Python 2.6.4)
Using the cmd console,
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100218.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added '.' to the permitted characters when parsing the name of a property.
The name itself is no longer reported in the error message.
I've also corrected the
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the quick update,
I confirm the fix for both issues;
just another finding (while testing the behaviour mentioned previously -
msg91917)
The property name normalisation seem to be much more robust now, I just
encountered an
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
I've been aware for some time that exception messages in Python 2 can't be
Unicode, but I wasn't sure which encoding to use, so I've decided to use that
of sys.stdout.
It appears to work OK in IDLE and at the Python prompt.
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'd like to add another issue I encountered with the latest version of regex -
issue2636-20100204.zip
It seems, that there is an error in handling some quantifiers in python 2.5
on
Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Dec 23 2008, 15:10:54) [MSC
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100210.zip is a new version of the regex module.
The reported bugs appear to be fixed now.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16195/issue2636-20100210.zip
___
Python
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi, thanks for the update!
Just for the unlikely case, it hasn't been noticed sofar, using python 2.6.4
or 2.5.4 with the regexp build issue2636-20100204.zip
I am getting the following easy-to-fix error:
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100204.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've added splititer and added a build for Python 3.1.
--
versions: +Python 3.1
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16122/issue2636-20100204.zip
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100116.zip is a new version of the regex module.
I've given up on the breadth-wise matching - it was too difficult finding a
pattern structure that would work well for both depth-first and breadth-wise.
It probably
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
priority: - normal
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'd like to add some detail to the previous msg91473
The current behaviour of the character properties looks a bit
surprising sometimes:
regex.findall(ur\p{UppercaseLetter}, uQW\p{UppercaseLetter}as)
[u'Q', u'W', u'U', u'L']
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
Matthew's 20080915.zip attachment is now on PyPI. This one, having a
more complete MANIFEST, will build for people other than me.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Summerfield m...@qtrac.eu added the comment:
Hi,
I've noticed 3 differences between the re and regex engines.
I don't know if they are intended or not, but thought it best to mention
them. (I used the issue2636-20090810#3.zip version.)
Python 2.6.2 (r262:71600, Apr 20 2009, 09:25:38)
John Machin sjmac...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Simplification of mark's first two problems:
Problem 1: looks like regex's negative look-head assertion is broken
re.findall(r'(?!a)\w', 'abracadabra')
['b', 'r', 'c', 'd', 'b', 'r']
regex.findall(r'(?!a)\w', 'abracadabra')
[]
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20090815.zip fixes the bugs found in msg91598 and msg91607.
The regex engine currently lacks some of the optimisations that the re
engine has, but I've concluded that even with them the extra work that
the engine needs to
Alex Willmer a...@moreati.org.uk added the comment:
I've made an installable package of Matthew Barnett's patch. It may get
this to a wider audience.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
Next I'll look at incorporating Andrew Kuchling's suggestion of the re
tests from CPython.
--
Jeffrey C. Jacobs timeho...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
/lurk
Re: timings
Thanks for the info, John. First of all, I really like those tests and
could you please submit a patch or other document so that we could
combine them into the python test suite.
The python test suite,
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Remember, though, that
when run as a single instance, at least in the existing engine, the re
compiler caches recent compiles, so repeatedly compiling an expression
flattens the overhead in a single run to a single compile and lookup,
where
Jeffrey C. Jacobs timeho...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Mea culpa et mes apologies,
The '-s' option to John's expressions are indeed executed only once --
they are one-time setup lines. The final quoted expression is what's
run multiple times.
In other words, improving caching in
Changes by Walter Dörwald wal...@livinglogic.de:
--
nosy: -doerwalter
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Collin Winter coll...@gmail.com added the comment:
FYI, Unladen Swallow includes several regex benchmark suites: a port of
V8's regex benchmarks (regex_v8); some of the regexes used when tuning
the existing sre engine 7-8 years ago (regex_effbot); and a
regex_compile benchmark that tests
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry for the dumb question, which may also suggest, that I'm
unfortunately unable to contribute at this level (with zero knowledge
of C and only working one for Python):
Where can I find the sources for tests etc. and how they are
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Take a look a the dev FAQ, linked from http://www.python.org/dev. The
tests are in Lib/test in a distribution installed from source, but
ideally you would be (anonymously) pulling the trunk from SVN (when it
is back) and creating your
John Machin sjmac...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
What is the expected timing comparison with re? Running the Aug10#3
version on Win XP SP3 with Python 2.6.3, I see regex typically running
at only 20% to %50 of the speed of re in ASCII mode, with
not-very-atypical tests (find all
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
First, many thanks for this contribution; it's great, that the re
module gets updated in that comprehensive way!
I'd like to report some issue with the current version
(issue2636-20090804.zip).
Using an empty string as the search
John Machin sjmac...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Adding to vbr's report: [2.6.2, Win XP SP3] (1) bug mallocs memory
inside loop (2) also happens to regex.findall with patterns 'a{0,0}' and
'\B' (3) regex.sub('', 'x', 'abcde') has similar problem BUT 'a{0,0}'
and '\B' appear to work
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20090810.zip should fix the empty-string bug.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14682/issue2636-20090810.zip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20090810#2.zip has some further improvements and bugfixes.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14683/issue2636-20090810#2.zip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'd like to confirm, that the above reported error is fixed in
issue2636-20090810#2.zip
While testing the new features a bit, I noticed some irregularity in
handling the Unicode Character Properties;
I tried randomly some of those
101 - 200 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
