[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: I have to admit, I did not see some of the negative votes in this ticket before merging the patch. If your is opposition is strong, please comment and suggest a better improvement over the patch. thank you! --

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: I reviewed in the pull request. I agree that the wording was slightly better than the original. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Changes by Senthil Kumaran : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: New changeset a71a3ad54d14483cfaebd8e0fb96c97c798d9e32 by Senthil Kumaran in branch '3.6': bpo-26947: DOC: clarify wording on hashable in glossary (#948) (#957) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a71a3ad54d14483cfaebd8e0fb96c97c798d9e32 --

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: New changeset 51fc7e3d6a29de7b3142e51f8caf4d31f7ac72a0 by Senthil Kumaran in branch '3.5': bpo-26947: DOC: clarify wording on hashable in glossary (#948) (#958) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/51fc7e3d6a29de7b3142e51f8caf4d31f7ac72a0 --

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Changes by Senthil Kumaran : -- pull_requests: +1140 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Changes by Senthil Kumaran : -- pull_requests: +1139 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: New changeset 64c887ab3a400cf91bde4f0c5ef69eacc88bc5e1 by Senthil Kumaran (csabella) in branch 'master': bpo-26947: DOC: clarify wording on hashable in glossary (#948) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/64c887ab3a400cf91bde4f0c5ef69eacc88bc5e1

[issue26947] Hashable documentation improvement needed

Martin Panter added the comment: The pull request currently suggests “All of Python’s immutable built-in objects are hashable; mutable containers (such as lists or dictionaries) are not.” This seems better wording than the original. FWIW, I would have tried “Python’s built-in immutable