[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I've just looked at the existing tests for random.shuffle() and found that they already cover this case and do a much more thorough job. The suggested patch doesn't add anything. Sorry, I'm going to close this one -- there isn't any problem being

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Jonathan Kross added the comment: Just giving this one a bump to see if it can be applied soon. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Jonathan Kross added the comment: Just giving this one a bump to see if it can be applied soon. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Yes -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Jonathan Kross added the comment: Just checking in on this patch. Any chance of getting it applied within the next few days? -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Okay, this looks fine. I'll apply it within a few days. -- assignee: -> rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

jonathan.kross added the comment: Changed the test to assertCountEqual which will check that all the inputs are present and equal in the output. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file43019/test_random_shuffle.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

New submission from Raymond Hettinger: This tests that a specific shuffle result is obtained (which is an implementation specific detail subject to change). An alternate possible test would just check to see that all the inputs are present in the output. -- nosy: +rhettinger

[issue27131] Unit test random shuffle

Changes by jonathan.kross : -- components: Tests files: test_random_shuffle.patch keywords: patch nosy: jonathan.kross priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Unit test random shuffle versions: Python 3.6 Added file: